Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,102 sentences · 1 filter applied

showed a trendp = 0.0571.1× alpha
In multivariate analysis, overlap syndromes (OR 1.85, CI 1.42–2.40; p < 0.001), arterial hypertension (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16–2.1; p = 0.003), SLE flare (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.33–2.33; p < 0.001), and vascular events (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.80–5.38; p < 0.001) remained independently associated with adverse outcomes, while antimalarial use showed a trend towards protection (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60–1.01; p = 0.057) ( Table 5 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
A total of 562 patients (27.27%) were smokers—the prevalence of smoking was higher among men (30.20%; n = 289) compared to women (24.73%; n = 273); the difference was found to be statistically marginally significant ( p = 0.057).
borderline significancep = 0.0571.1× alpha
Predictors of Cardiac Overload or HF Risk Multivariate logistic regression identified three independent predictors of falling into the “HF likely” or “HF very high-risk” categories ( Table 3 ): AECOPD within the previous 30 days (OR 9.0, 95% CI 1.5–54.7; p = 0.017), lower hemoglobin levels (borderline significance, p = 0.057), and number of antihypertensive medications (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.6; p = 0.031).
marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
ΔBMI had a significant main effect on Emotional Symptoms [F(1, 31) = 10.55, p = 0.003, ƞ 2 p = 0.254], and a marginally significant effect on Total score of SDQ [F(1, 31) = 3.892, p = 0.057, ƞ 2 p = 0.112], suggesting that participants with greater changes in BMI, regardless of whether these changes constituted an increase or decrease, showed different overall levels of psychological adjustment.
slightly significantp = 0.0581.2× alphaqualifiedgold
A slightly significant interaction effect (Model B t1 : group × proactive parenting behavior t1: F (1,39) = 3.82, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.09) and a slightly significant three-way interaction effect (Model B t1 : group x proactive parenting behavior t1 × time: F (1,39) = 3.90, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.09) were found.
borderline significancep = 0.0581.2× alpha
In the multivariate analysis, both parameters predicted this outcome with a borderline significance (OR for the glucose levels: 1.10 (1.00; 1.22) mg/dL p = 0.058, OR for BMI: 0.39 (0.15; 1.01) p = 0.052), but the model explained a large proportion of the variance of the dependent variable ( p for the model < 0.001, R 2 = 0.72).