Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,163 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP≤0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on the obtained results, the data was considered not significant (P≥0.05), significant * (P≤0.05), highly significant ** (P≤0.01), or very highly significant *** (P≤0.001).
ADAM8 as a drug target in pancreatic cancer.
Nat Commun · 2015 · PMC5014123
highly significantP <0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
3b ) and a meta-analysis of the two agents revealed highly significant decreases ( P <0.01, n =25, one-sided analysis of variance (ANOVA), percentages±s.d.; statistical details in Fig. 3 legend and Methods) in the αS60:14 ratio for A30P (77.5±15.5% of WT, that is, a 22.5% decrease), E46K (61.7±10.1% of WT, a 38.3% decrease), G51D (47.8±10.0% of WT, a 52.2% decrease) and A53T (66.5±10.4% of WT, a 33.5% decrease).
highly significantP <0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The following criteria were used to identify the best-fit model for each crop–region yield trend: highly significant (Student’s t -test; P <0.01) model parameters, highest r 2 and lowest r.m.s.e. compared with other models, and independent, normally distributed yield residuals with homogenous variance and unbiased distribution when residuals were plotted against year ( Fig. 4 ).
highly significantP <0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
A test of the trends in residuals against a null hypothesis of a distribution about a mean of zero indicates highly significant negative trends in the two cloudy sectors ( P <0.01), significant negative trends in the clear-warm sector ( P =0.03), and no trend in the clear-cold sector.
highly significantP = 0.0130.3× alphaqualifiedgold
A combined analysis revealed that the reduction in neurite complexity in patient organoids was highly significant with respect to number of branchpoints ( t -test, P = 0.013, Fig. 4b , upper left), neurite length ( t -test, P = 0.0209, Fig. 4b , upper middle) and number of primary neurites ( t -test, P = 0.0038, Fig. 4b , upper right).
nominally significantp- value = 0.01390.3× alphagold
Notably, ANO10 (c.203-2 AG > G) heterozygous carriers also exhibited a nominally significant reduction in full-arm length (Mann–Whitney U test, p- value = 0.0139, Fig. 3d ), although the association test ( p- value = 4.12 × 10 −5 ) did not surpass the level of significance required by Bonferroni correction, likely because the correction approach is highly conservative and would tend to “overcorrect” the variants in the context of a mild or small effect 48 .
nominally significantP = 0.0140.3× alphagold
Although only nominally significant in the gender-heart failure interaction analysis ( P = 0.014), in a separate analysis within males and females, TMAO was elevated in male ICM (FC = 1.95, adjusted p value = 0.018) and DCM (FC = 1.96, adjusted p value = 0.026) compared to male donor hearts, whereas it was not significantly different between female HF and female donor hearts.
marginal significancep = 0.0140.3× alphagold
Although the latency difference between stimulation and non-stimulation trials reached marginal significance at the population level ( n = 56 sites, z = -2.45, p = 0.014; two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test), the difference was small, and only one of the 56 stimulation sites showed a significant effect ( p < 0.05; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test).
marginally significantP =0.0140.3× alphagold
marginally non-significantP =0.0671.3× alpha
X-linked d N / d S is greater though marginally non-significant for X-linked genes (86 genes, permutation test with 1,000 replicates, P =0.067) relative to the autosomes (4,755 genes), due to a marginally significant increase in d N (permutation test with 1000 replicates, P =0.014) ( Supplementary Table 6 , Supplementary Fig. 5 ).