Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,910 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, we observed a pattern, even if non-significant, of fatty acid synthase (FAS) to decrease ( Figure 7 ), FAS-associated protein with death domain (FADD) ( Figure 8 ) and, of peculiar interest, highly significant ( p < 0.01) adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) immunostaining ( Figure 9 ). 3.2.
nominally significantp < 0.010.2× alphagold
No genes remained significant after multiple testing correction; however, nominally significant candidates ( p < 0.01) highlighted pathways related to steroidogenesis and metabolic regulation.
marginally significantp = 0.0100.2× alphagold
Results : In the total population, a marginally significant positive correlation was observed between mtDNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) and serum 25(OH)D 3 levels (r = 0.210; p = 0.010), which did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Histomorphometric Analyses In the morphometric analysis of the perimeter (μm) (mean ± SD) of the muscle fibers, the comparison between group R (health control) versus all other groups highlighted a statistically highly significant hypertrophy in groups R-DS and HFEVO-DS ( p < 0.01) and a statistically highly significant hypotrophy in group HFB-DR ( p < 0.01).
a significant trendp = 0.0110.2× alphagold
A significant trend was observed in the subscale Enjoyment of Food and Emotional Overeating in children with obesity ( p = 0.011 and p = 0.008), abdominal obesity ( p = 0.031 and p = 0.017), and cardiometabolic risk ( p = 0.036 and p = 0.049) in the non-EBF group, compared to those who were EBF up to 6 months of age.
a significant trendp = 0.0120.2× alphagold
Familiarity with Nutri-Score increased monotonically across educational strata, from 30.5% in upper-secondary/vocational respondents to 33.3% in post-secondary non-tertiary, 38.7% in university, and 48.4% in postgraduate respondents, with a significant trend across ordered educational levels (Spearman ρ = 0.14, p = 0.012); the omnibus four-group χ 2 did not reach significance (χ 2 = 6.27, df = 3, p = 0.099), consistent with a graded rather than threshold effect.
borderline significantp = 0.0150.3× alphagold
Considering the Bonferroni correction at p < 0.01, there was a borderline significant ( p = 0.015) decrease in the mean total of vegetables that children had never tried or were not sure if they tried between preprogram (1.82 ± 1.84) and post-program (0.95 ± 1.33).