Excerpts

The linear mixed model identified a marginally insignificant result for the 1mcW group–time interaction ( p = 0.052; Table 5 ).

The IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry showed a decrease in the DHA group, which almost reached statistical significance ( p = 0.052), but between-group differences were not observed.

In the DHA group, within-group differences were not found in any ophthalmological measures, although IOP (GAT) showed a decrease, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

23.5%), but this difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

17%) and the duration of supplementary oxygen was longer, at the limit of significance (408 vs. 120 h, p = 0.052).

The mean change in IL-6 levels was significantly reduced from baseline in the CKDB-315 group (−0.25 pg/mL; p = 0.0262 within the group, with a marginally significant difference between groups ( p = 0.0520) ( Figure S2B ).

Only hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) levels showed a trend toward a negative correlation (r = −0.370; p = 0.052) and tended to increase in the CQN group. 4.

Parallel to the result obtained with FSD, when this parameter was analyzed over 21 weeks, the results reached a near-significant level ( p = 0.052), with a 36% reduction in the URTI score median in the COL group compared to the PBO group.

The repeated measures of periods ending at weeks 4, 8, 12, 14, 16 and 18 also consistently showed a significant result in this regard, while the borderline significance was found at week 21 ( p = 0.052).

The SHM group showed a trend towards lowering the ratio of fat to body mass than OVX, OVX-E, OVX-A, and OVX-AE groups (main group effect, η 2 = 0.248, p = 0.052; Figure 1 B).

Conversely, the pro-WP fraction manifests 19.2% non-consumers, a median of 56.6 g/d, and a narrower variability (IQR: 23.6–80), with a nearly significant divergence ( p = 0.052).

A borderline significant interaction effect presented for interference parameters of the VLMT ( F (6,182) = 2.219, p = 0.052).

Distance per minute showed a marginally significant interaction between product and match week ( p = 0.052; η 2 p = 0.064, moderate effect size).

Although a decreasing trend in adherence was observed across groups, the between-group difference was not statistically significant (χ 2 = 5.93, df = 2, p = 0.052).

The HR for Q2–4 combined as compared to Q1 was significant in the univariate analysis [1.42 (1.09–1.99), p = 0.046], but became borderline significant after adjusting for the variables in Model 3 [1.42 (1.00–2.04), p = 0.052], as shown in Table 4 .

Further analysis using ANOVA revealed a main effect ( p = 0.049), and post hoc analyses indicated a strong trend towards rBF increase from CTL to DAT ( p = 0.052) ( Figure 4 A).

The association of ethnicity with absolute servings of yogurt was not quite significant ( p = 0.052).

Treatment effects also varied significantly by newborn sex for newborn weight ( p = 0.028) with marginally significant results for weight to length ratio-for-age z -score ( p = 0.052) and length-for-age z -score ( p = 0.071).

Results based on the level of salt and herbs and spices (two-factor analysis) showed that the effect of herbs and spices was as large as the effect of salt on overall liking by reaching borderline significance (F(1, 276) = 3.79, p = 0.052; F(1, 276) = 3.29, p = 0.071, respectively).

The difference in PSS-10 scores approached significance (U = 5628.50, Z = −1.95, p = 0.052), with lower scores observed in supplement users.

This effect in females was significant for the 0.06 M ( p < 0.01), 0.1 M ( p < 0.05), and 1 M ( p < 0.01) solutions and tended toward significance for the 0.03 M ( p = 0.052) and 0.6 M ( p = 0.059) solutions.

PROP responsiveness decreased with age (F = 13.60, p < 0.0001), with an interaction with gender close to significance ( p = 0.052). 3.2.

[ 70 ] reported a decreasing trend close to significance ( p = 0.052), while Iaffaldano et al.

Within the groups, the low PEL control group decreased their cognitive SR skills (borderline significance, p = 0.052).

Further adjustment mitigated the association between CSE timing and the continuous MNA-SF score so that it became only marginally significant ( p = 0.052).