Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp = 0.020.4× alphaqualifiedgold
The overall pooled effect size of the static balance function in the experimental group did not significantly differ from that in the control group [Hedges’ g: 1.32 (95% CI: -0.41, 3.06) at p = 0.13], with a highly significant difference in heterogeneity ( I 2 = 81% at p = 0.02).
highly significantP<0.020.4× alphaqualifiedgold
A multiple regression model of parasite prevalence on both elevation and temperature was highly significant (F 2,3 = 164.63, P<0.02, R 2 = 0.99, Adjusted R 2 = 0.98) but only temperature contributed significantly to the model (temperature: Beta = 0.99 P = 0.02; elevation: Beta = 0.004 P>0.98).
borderline significantP = 0.0220.4× alphagold
When the same analysis was done for each tumour stage separately, a borderline significant correlation between the 16p13.3 alteration and disease recurrence was only observed in stage II tumours (*P = 0.022) (Figures B-D in S6 File ).
Focus on 16p13.3 Locus in Colon Cancer.
PLoS One · 2015 · PMC4519182
weakly significantp = 0.0220.4× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of the M100 amplitudes revealed a weakly significant main effect of frequency in which higher frequencies have larger amplitudes ( F (5,88) = 2.79; p = 0.022), no main effect for signal type ( F (1,88) = 0.54; p = 0.46), and a significant interaction between frequency and signal type ( F (5,88) = 5.82; p <0.0001).
marginally significantp = .0220.4× alphagold
Post-hoc tests using the Bonferroni correction revealed that for the group without experience with the horse-riding dance, only RTs for MP5 showed significant or marginally significant differences from all the other MPs ( p = .022 for MP1, p = .052 for MP4, p = .001 for MP8; MP1, 382.88ms; MP4, 377.71ms; MP5, 396.51ms; MP8, 364.52ms), whereas the other three MPs did not.
a significant trendp = 0.0230.5× alphagold
However, this largely reflected a significant trend in the population aged 80 years and older, increasing by 0.89 (95% CI: 0.15–1.63) visits per 100,000 persons per year (p = 0.023), with other age groups remaining stable ( Fig 5 ).