(We also found a marginally significant between-group difference in the right pallidum (SCZ median: 2.16, range: 2.067–2.215 vs HC median: 2.117, range: 1.927–2.184, U = 110, p = 0.040), however, we note that the comparison did not survive significance testing after removing an outlier from the HC group).
Excerpts
None of the SNPs showed significant associations in cases with non-operable tumor stage, with the possible exception of 5q11.2-rs889312 which showed a marginally statistically significant association (adjusted P = 0.04).
After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the association between the MMP9 R279Q variant and stroke was modestly significant, with participants carrying the minor G allele having decreased risk of stroke (HR = 1.00 for AA, 0.87 for GA, 0.91 for GG; P = 0.04, additive genetic model).
The main effect of ISI on the size of LFP responses was not significant (F(1,868) = 3.31, p = 0.07), and even the interaction between ISI and the group of rats was only borderline significant (F(1,866) = 4.35, p = 0.04).
showed a trendp = 0.04
PennCNV showed a trend at the PARK2 locus (p = 0.04; Figure S1A ) that was not significant after correcting for multiple tests.
Three-factor RM-ANOVA (target size x target location x luminance type) for BSRs showed a marginally statistically significant main effect of only target location [F(4,240) = 3.94, p = 0.04, η p 2 = 0.01)], while target size [F(1,240) = 2.13, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.03)] and stimulus luminance [F(1,240) = 20, p = 0.77, η p 2 ≤0.01)] were not statistically significant ( Fig 6 ).
At rs1477798 in 15q22.31 which showed evidence of linkage in clinic-based, larger families, a nominally significant case-control association was observed (OR 1.16, p = 0.04) which was modestly strengthened for cases with CRC family history (OR 1.24, p = 0.03); however, no significant difference in risk by family history was observed and associations were far from genome-wide significant.
Differences did not reach statistical significance compared to spontaneous preterm cases except for sICAM-1 and sE-selectin in the 3 rd trimester (p<0.04 for each, table 2 ).
While HbA1C did not show any significant associations in any of the areas, FBS showed significant association with increased thickness in the superior parafoveal sector, but did not reach statistical significance when Bonferroni correction was applied, p = 0.04.
Correlation of MS admissions with smoking prevalence There was a nominally significant inverse correlation with smoking but this was lost in the weighted regression ( figure 2a ; overall – r = −0.55, p = 0.04, r sw = −0.49, p = 0.08; r pw = −0.25, p = 0.39; figure 2b ; males – r = −0.52, p = 0.06, r sw = −0.47, p = 0.09; r pw = −0.21, p = 0.47; females – r = −0.56, p = 0.04; r sw = −0.49, p = 0.08; r pw = −0.25, p = 0.38).
and X2 P=0.02 respectively).” “However, analyzing each variant separately revealed that the p.V443I variant occurred at higher frequency in AHM cases (4.44%) compared to PM cases (1.57%), BNMS controls (0.84%), or the MGRB (1.09%) (combined control comparison X2 P=.01), with comparison of any case nominally significant (X2 unadjusted P=0.04).” “Most significantly, the rs7174027*A SNP flanking the OCA2 gene promoter region/transcription start site was absent in AHM patients, compared to a frequency of 7.1% in the PM group (X2 unadjusted P=0.0005) and 9.43% frequency in the BNMS control group (X2 unadjusted P=8x10-5).” Supplementary materials have track changes and highlight marks that need to be removed.
A decrease in distal zone length was also slightly significant between the two years, but only when all genotypes were considered together (p value = 0.04).
borderline significancep -value = 0.040
With the no-schooling group as the baseline, the subjects with a “primary education” were positively associated with total cost at a borderline significance level (estimated coefficient = 1579.521, p -value = 0.040).
Sighted controls’ error when the sound ended 25 cm to the right was only marginally significant (one sample, 2-tailed t-tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison, t (7) = 2.44, p = 0.04).
Expanding to the 14 days before incentives, we found a marginally significant difference (F(14, 49) = 1.98; p = 0.04), that was driven by slight differences between states with and without incentives in the 7–14 days before incentives were introduced.
Only in the group of AIPC with intrapancreatic involvement there was a slightly significant increase in the IgG4-CD138 ratio in comparison with non-autoimmune CP (p = 0.04).
Our time-series analysis documented an increasing trend in the monthly rates of HIV tests per 1000 patient-visits before the policy change (average monthly increase of 0.19 [CI, 0.01–0.38], p = 0.04) ( Figure 1A ).
While the change in performance across the five days was highly significant for the congruent group (F(4,24) = 14.158, p<.0001, one-way repeated-measure ANOVA), the performance change was only moderately significant for the unisensory group (F(4,24) = 2.938, p = .04) and marginally significant for the incongruent group (F(4,24) = 2.937, p = .053).
barely failed to reach significancep = 0.040
This difference was significant for the Runner group [t(9) = -3.105, p = 0.012] but barely failed to reach significance for the Team sports group [t(9) = -2.392, p = 0.040 uncorrected, with an alpha adjusted to 0.025].
Accordingly, of the two non-significant studies in our sample, one of them–the ACCORD trial [ 60 ]–had a replication with a significant result–in this case, a large meta-analysis that reached marginal significance (p = 0.04).
However, at one month, a strong trend between reduced AD in affected nerves and RNFL thinning and mfVEP amplitude attenuation in affected eyes at six months (RNFL: R = 0.38, p = 0.04; mfVEP: R = 0.41, p = 0.02) was observed.
Phyla-level phylogenetic binning of 16S rRNA data revealed a nominally significant correlation between the Bacteroidetes:Firmicutes ratio and age- and sex- adjusted BMI (r = 0.116; p = 0.04), but no significant correlation with metabolic syndrome traits [fasting glucose (r = 0.075; p = 0.19), systolic or diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.016; p = 0.78 and (r = 0.043; p = 0.45), respectively), fasting triglycerides (r = 0.078; p = 0.17), HDL-cholesterol (r = −0.052; p = 0.36); all adjusted for age and sex) Results from unweighted UniFrac analysis [16] also did not distinguish among the subjects based on BMI ( Figure S5 ).
Hypsodonty shows no relationship with time in either clade ( Table S4 , Dataset S2 ), but ANCOVA shows the observed difference in the intercepts is marginally significant ( p = 0.04, Figure S5 , Table S3 ), meaning that Karnimata species have higher tooth crowns than the “ Progonomys clade”.
close to significancep = 0.04
The DysRSP was activated in mice using the sequential egocentric strategy, its recruitment being also close to significance in allocentric mice (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.04, sequential egocentric versus swimming controls Mann-Whitney U , p = 0.02, allocentric versus swimming controls Mann-Whitney U , p = 0.06 for DysRSP; Fig. 2I ).
Interestingly, post-hoc simple comparisons of each phase of the menstrual cycle also revealed that emotional word advantage was significantly greater in LVF than RVF during the menstruation phase ( F (1, 9) = 7.8611, p = .02), marginally significant during the follicular phase (F(1, 9) = 5.8, p = .04) and not significant during the early, mid- and late luteal phases ( p >.05).