Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP = 0.0450.9× alphaqualifiedgold
In addition, pairwise analysis of similarity [ 25 ] suggested that there were highly significant differences between the Cn and Fe groups (global R = 0.139, P = 0.045), the Cn and FP groups (global R = 0.239, P = 0.004), the Cn and Po groups (global R = 0.253, P = 0.005), the Fe and FP groups (global R = 0.387, P = 0.003), the Fe and Po groups (global R = 0.436, P = 0.004), and the FP and Po groups (global R = 0.165, P = 0.05) ( Table 1 ).
marginally significantP = 0.0450.9× alphagold
Cancerous and paracancerous normal tissues from patients at different stages of cancer development and progression had a similar level of CASP8 mRNA expression ( Figure 4 ), although cancerous tissues from patients at T4 stage had a marginally significant higher mRNA expression than paired paracancerous normal tissues ( P = 0.045; Figure 4c ).
Median 3D7 MSP2 IgG levels were consistently higher in cohort 2 compared to cohort 1 at all time points ( Figure 2 ; Table 4 ), although this did not reach statistical significance except at day 168 for which there was some evidence of increased 3D7 MSP2 responses in cohort 2 compared to cohort 1 (P = 0.045).
borderline significancep = 0.0450.9× alpha
Moreover, an analysis of peanut-extract specific IgE titers (listed in Table 1 ) and T cell cytokine production revealed a significant correlation for IL-5 (p<0.0001), IL-17 (p<0.0001) and IL-10 (p = 0.03) production in response to the P19 pool, whereas correlation between sIgE and extract-specific T cell responses only reach borderline significance for IL-5 (p = 0.045) and IL-17 (p = 0.043) ( Table 2 ).
nominally significantp = 0.0450.9× alphagold
Simple t -tests contrasting the trait values of those recombinants subjected to WGS- or MSG-based genotyping were not significant in most cases ( p > 0.1 for lobe area, height, width, height-to-width ratio, PC2, and PC3), and only nominally significant in one case that does not survive correction for multiple testing ( p = 0.045 for PC1).
The association between TGF-βRII and p-Smad2 resulted barely statistically significant (p = 0.0459): only 1 among the 9 p-Smad2 negative patients resulted positive to TGF-βRII and 10 among the 20 p-Smad2 positive resulted positive to TGF-βRII.
a significant trendp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Statistical tests showed that uptake was significantly greater downstream of the branch than upstream in the immature rabbits (p = 0.0024); there were no such differences for the mature and ex-breeder rabbits (p = 0.68 and p = 0.31 respectively), whereas in the >5 year old female rabbits there was a significant trend in the opposite direction (p = 0.046).
borderline significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
The associations of the highest stress category with systolic BP, diastolic BP and MAP remained after full adjustment for confounders: Children from mothers in the highest stress category, which denotes the presence of three or four stressors, had a borderline significant 1.5 mmHg higher systolic BP (p = 0.046), a 1.5 mmHg higher diastolic BP (p = 0.04) and a 1.5 higher MAP (p = 0.02), compared with the children of mothers in the no stress category.
weakly significantp = 0.0460.9× alphaqualifiedgold
highly significantqualifiedgold
During hypnotic hypoalgesia we found that current density at BA3 contralateral to the stimulated hand was a weakly significant predictor (p = 0.046) of perceived pain, while this relation was found to be more robust during hyperalgesia treatment wherein the inclusion of hypnotizability level was highly significant in this relation.
marginally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
In male subjects, the slope of the regression line fitted to data from subjects with 0 AGG interruptions showed a marginally significant difference from the slope of the regression line fitted to data from subjects with 1 interruption (P = 0.046); no other significant differences in slopes or intercepts of regression lines were seen for male or female subjects.
marginally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Our best explanation is that this result may be due simply to the small sample size (N = 10), although even with this small sample, finding that only 3 (30%) colonies that scored as Africanized rather than the expected 60.85%, as found in our large sample of San Diego County foraging workers is marginally significant ( χ 2 = 3.995, P = 0.046).