Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
In male subjects, the slope of the regression line fitted to data from subjects with 0 AGG interruptions showed a marginally significant difference from the slope of the regression line fitted to data from subjects with 1 interruption (P = 0.046); no other significant differences in slopes or intercepts of regression lines were seen for male or female subjects.
borderline significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
For the Western pattern, the smoking × adherence interaction for high versus low adherence was negative and borderline significant (β = −0.0653; 95% CI −0.1294, −0.0011; P = 0.046), suggesting that the Western–AIP contrast was smaller among smokers than non-smokers.
a significant trendp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Statistical tests showed that uptake was significantly greater downstream of the branch than upstream in the immature rabbits (p = 0.0024); there were no such differences for the mature and ex-breeder rabbits (p = 0.68 and p = 0.31 respectively), whereas in the >5 year old female rabbits there was a significant trend in the opposite direction (p = 0.046).
barely significantp = .0460.9× alphagold
In this case the interaction between political identity and state blueness was barely significant, R 2 change = .000, F (1, 8332) = 3.99, p = .046, and exhibited a different pattern than that observed in the 2012 data (with the strongest effect of state blueness amongst moderates), suggesting that interactive effects may be inconsistent over time.
marginally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Our best explanation is that this result may be due simply to the small sample size (N = 10), although even with this small sample, finding that only 3 (30%) colonies that scored as Africanized rather than the expected 60.85%, as found in our large sample of San Diego County foraging workers is marginally significant ( χ 2 = 3.995, P = 0.046).
weakly significantp = 0.0460.9× alphaqualifiedgold
highly significantqualifiedgold
During hypnotic hypoalgesia we found that current density at BA3 contralateral to the stimulated hand was a weakly significant predictor (p = 0.046) of perceived pain, while this relation was found to be more robust during hyperalgesia treatment wherein the inclusion of hypnotizability level was highly significant in this relation.
marginally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
In the whole population, the “older” group has a higher proportion of stereo-negatives, which is marginally significant (p = 0.046 for “older” vs. “visually developing”, p = 0.03 for “older” vs. “visually mature”, bootstrap resampling), but this difference vanishes if we consider only the sub-population without visual problems.
only marginally significantp = .0460.9× alphagold
Only in the parietal region P, some small and very small interaction effects of Light Condition with Time of Day were observed, however, this interaction effect was only marginally significant and was omitted due to the FDR limit ( Alpha Band Power P , LC × ToD : Χ 2 (4) = 9.69, p = .046, ω p 2 = -.01, very small).