One-way Anova analysis showed that intramuscular treatments effected the number of regenerating fibers by a quasi-significant level after one week of regeneration (df:3,19; F = 3.137, p = 0.05).
Excerpts
Two subscales did not reach statistical significance at the p<0.05 level at one-year follow-up vs. baseline: non-distracting: 3.37 vs 3.03, respectively; p = 0.09, emotional awareness: 3.45 vs 3.12, respectively; p = 0.16.
Furthermore, one of our analyses displayed a strong trend (HbR by RT p = 0.05) and may be interpreted with caution.
Besides, the results of repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant trend in VAS through the study (F = 44.603, P< 0.05) and the two groups had significantly different trends (F = 68.566.
Fourteen out of twenty-eight selected SNPs showed nominally significant associations at p <0.05 with different dimension-specific quantitative assessments of psychotic experiences but each failed to meet statistical significance post correction for multiple testing ( p <0.0008; one-tailed).
borderline significancep = 0.050
In multivariate analysis, the SES score [second quartile compared with the first (highest), OR: 0.32, 0.11–0.95] remained significant and a longer travel time had borderline significance (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.27–1.00, p = 0.050).
All these factors were significantly associated with susceptibility to WTS except for perceived harm of WTS relative to cigarettes, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).
showed a trendp<0.05
Additionally, a few more channels that showed a trend-level difference (uncorrected p<0.05 but not remaining significant after FDR correction) were located approximately in the bilateral frontopolar ([FP]), dorsolateral ([DL]) and ventrolateral ([VL]) regions (uncorrected p<0.01; [FP] ch 36 (d = 0.83; 95%IC 0.19, 1.43), ch47 (d = 0.93; 95%IC 0.26,1.56
We did observe a marginally significant interaction between Consistency and Seeing, F (2, 32) = 3.30, p = .05, η p 2 = .171.
After pleasant picture presentation, a marginally significant decrease of the startle response was observed for val homozygotes dependent on an increase in CTQ scores ( β = −0.51, t = −2.16, p = 0.05), while no associations were observed for val/met ( β = 0.15, t = 0.97, p = 0.34) or met/met genotype carriers ( β = −0.21, t = −1.17, p = 0.25), respectively.
Similar tendency was observed in nominally significant bins (p-value < 0.05).
Temperature decrease also induced less reduction in glucose, fructose and sucrose in the roots and leaves (before decay, p < 0.05), but only marginally significant in the stems (p < 0.05).
Although the emotion factor did not reach statistical significance in the no odor condition, pairwise comparisons showed a relevant difference between happiness (1083.1 ms) and anger (1260 ms) (p < .05).
Retest), Frequency, and Group was marginally significant [ F (30,375)=1.49; p =.05].
The results of subgroup analysis are shown in S3 Fig in S1 File : in subgroups such as mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, hypertension, diabetes, vasopressors, INR, and fresh frozen plasma, the mortality risk of the rapidly ascending RDW group (Traj1) was significantly higher than that of the stable low-level group (Traj0) ( P < 0.05); while in subgroups such as age, chronic kidney disease, and Hb, although the mortality risk of the Traj1 group showed an increasing trend, the difference in some subgroups did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05), which may be related to the limited statistical power of smaller subgroups and residual confounding.
In slow and rapid progressors who did not develop AE the number of total leukocytes (CD45 + ) was positively correlated to the yearly decline in FVC (r = 0.52, p = 0.005) and showed a negative trend with the duration of symptoms before diagnosis (r = -0.35, p = 0.05).
Soluble protein Levels of soluble protein varied between 19.3 and 24.9 μg per individual and showed an increasing trend up to 48 hpf when the protein level was significantly higher than at 0 hpf (p < 0.05, Fig 1A ).
marginally non-significantp = .05
In addition, we observed a marginally non-significant main effect of gender , F (1,115) = 3.84, MSE = 9.23, p = .05, ηp 2 = .032, with boys keeping a higher number of stickers ( M = 9.01, SE = 0.36) than girls ( M = 8.00, SE = 0.39; Fig 1B ).
All nominally significant ( P <0.05) associations and corresponding trait distributions are shown in Table 2 .
Results show that Degree is a negative and marginally significant predictor of the burnout index (ß = -.22, p< .05), while constraint is not (p>.1).
However, baseline right hemisphere BA25 metabolism showed a marginally significant correlation with change from baseline MADRS, whereby higher baseline metabolism predicted better response to O/F therapy ( r = 0.68, P = .05).
Although weak and barely significant ( r = .11, p < .05), the correlation between need for relatedness and satisfaction with ABW environments indicates that the openness, transparency, and informal meeting spaces typical of ABW environments [ 2 ] are valued by workers who focus on social interactions.
Results for all SNPs that were nominally significant in our analysis (p<0.05) among the entire study cohort can be found in S2 Table .
It was reported that the −174 G>C polymorphism was not associated with cardiovascular death or a new myocardial infarction, whereas the −572 G>C polymorphism was associated with a borderline significant increase in risk ( P = 0.05) in univariate analysis [34] .
The difference to the private condition was marginally significant ( t (60) = 1.98, p = .05, 95% [-0.01, 1.15], d = 0.254).