Excerpts

There were 6 cases where an age-related gene also had a borderline significant F-test (P<0.05).

We did observe a marginally significant interaction between Consistency and Seeing, F (2, 32) = 3.30, p = .05, η p 2 = .171.

Eight SNPs were nominally significant with P ≤0.05: rs4246511 ( RHBDL2 ), rs365132 ( UIMC1 ), rs2307449 ( POLG ), rs1246111 ( NLRP11 ), rs12611091 ( BRSK1 ), rs1172822 ( BRSK1 ), rs2720044 ( ASH2L ), and rs7246479 ( TMEM150B ).

A near-significant reduction in GI bleeding was also observed (aHR 0.76, p=0.05).

The differences in mean for the followups included subset were substantial ( F 4,94 = 4.437, p <.01), while the differences for the followups removed subset were borderline significant ( F 6,140 = 2.097, p ≈.05).

Furthermore, a weighted polygenic risk score (PRS) made from the 18 SNPs common between the two datasets showed a nominally significant association ( P < 0.05) with the oral glucose tolerance test derived variables area under the curve (AUC) for insulin, AUC for insulin/AUC for glucose, insulin at 30 minutes and insulin sensitivity index ( S6 Table ).

The root exudates from the infected samples did not show any significant differences in TOC concentration at 400–450 ppm of CO 2 ; conversely, an increasing trend of TOC concentration was registered when the temperature and CO 2 level were increased (P < 0.05).

When discussing the results of the correlations performed in our study, one must bear in mind that even though the single correlations may be significant with a p <0.05, the overall risk of a type I error (false positive result) increases with the number of correlations.

Among these results, we also report a near-significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis test, W = 5.96, df = 2, P = 0.05) in the maximum crown diameter of the trees between the three genetic clusters when analyzing forest variables only.

The average difference of predictability between these two populations was a highly significant 0.10 (0.08 standard deviation, Wilcoxon sign-rank test p<0.05).

These studies generally include only those variants in their interaction analyses that have shown some nominal probability of marginal significance (e.g. p<0.05) in previous studies.

The interaction term was marginally significant t (1) = 1.94, p = .05, suggesting the difference in abstraction between cohorts is greater at higher levels of the intercept, although this effect was not predicted and should be interpreted accordingly.

The differences between Q1 group and Q2 group in Wbc count, Hb, Mono count, Eos count, BMI, waist, COPD, DM, CVD, hypertension, smoking status, asthma, stroke, race, education, and sex were statistically highly significant (all P < 0.05).

parviglumis was highly significant ( X 2 = 113, p-value < 0.05).

The % inhibition value after 4 h of oral administration was obtained as 81.76% for FFA/PEG SD in comparison with only 55.27% for FFA suspension which was statistically highly significant in comparison with FFA suspension (P < 0.05).

PCB 153 concentration was positively associated to AD concentration at the limit of significance in the crude model (β = 0.045, CI = 0.0002 to 0.090, p = 0.05), and this relationship was significant in the adjusted model (β = 0.054, CI = 0.010 to 0.098, p = 0.02).

Sequence divergences in 56 of the 102 species showed no association with distance, while 13 species showed a weakly significant Mantel correlation ( p <0.05) and 33 species showed a strong relationship ( p <0.01).

Several genera, including Clostridium, Ruthenibacterium, and Dorea, showed nominally significant associations (p < 0.05).

This was marginally significant in one-way ANOVA with repeated measures (F(2,28) = 4.9, p<0.05; n = 15, Fig 9G , lower part), however variability was high due to opposite (n = 2) or no (n = 3) response from 5 cells.

For the polar lipids, the percentage of C18:1n9 showed an increasing trend with increasing salinity ( P < 0.05), while no significant differences were found for the other fatty acids among four salinity treatments ( P > 0.05).

For the polar lipids, the percentage of C20:2n6 increased significantly with increasing salinity, while the levels of DHA and ∑n-3PUFA showed a decreasing trend with increasing salinity ( P < 0.05).

The experimental group showed a significant linear trend (F(1,19) = 4.68, p = 0.024) and the control group showed a nonsignificant trend (F(1,19) = 3.84, p = 0.05).

There was predominantly a candidate gene approach using common alleles, which despite small sample sizes (median 93 [IQR 40–222]) with no trend to an increase over time, generated a high proportion (74.5%) of nominally significant (p<0.05) reported associations suggesting the possibility of significance-chasing bias.

The α-diversity and NMDS analysis of bacterial community The shannon index and richness index of the total bacterial community increased ( Fig 2A , P < 0.05) with distance from the mining area and reached a maximum at distance H5, while the simpson index showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing, and then reached a maximum at distance H2 (P < 0.05), and was higher than that of H0, although it decreased at distances H3 and H5.

When the Training x ROI ANOVA was performed for groups separately, the experimental group had a significant effect of ROI (F(2,26) = 3.13, p = .025), but not Training (F(4,52) = 0.44, p = 0.39), and the ROI x Training interaction approached significance (F(4,52) = 2.24, p = 0.05).