Excerpts

The GLM analysis with three different response models (by varying the HRF peak latency with 3s increments) yielded almost entirely distinctive activation maps ( Fig 2B ), each of which was only marginally significant ( p <0.05, uncorrected).

coli detection on ED attendances is only marginally statistically significant, and thus the null hypothesis for this outcome cannot be rejected at the conventional significance level of p<0.05.

There were less genes indicated from cord blood, peripheral blood or saliva samples collected later in life from twins, therefore GO term analysis indicated only nominally significant processes (with p-values < 0.05 but FDR corrected p-values > 0.1), highlighting phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transduction, axon guidance and other cell proliferation processes.

Among teenage mothers, the odds of institutional delivery was higher at the marginally significant level (p = 0.05) among the middle [AOR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.00 3.02] and rich [AOR: 13.70; 95% CI: 1.89 59.09] economic groups.

Furthermore, metastatic disease was borderline significant as negative predictor for survival (metastatic vs. non-metastatic; 5.3 years vs. not reached; P = 0.05).

This finding should be interpreted with caution since it was only marginally significant ( p = 0.05) in one out of several tests conducted.

While CRP levels, modelled as a continuous variable, were not associated with OLD, we did find a marginally significant association at CRP levels above 9 mg/L (aOR = 2.55, 95%CI 0.97–6.76, p = 0.05) ( S1 Table ).

Results for all SNPs that were nominally significant in our analysis (p<0.05) among the entire study cohort can be found in S2 Table .

However, only a borderline significant association was observed between very preterm neonates and controls (adjusted OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.03–3.19; P = 0.050).

For LF-HRV there was a significant negative correlation with working memory accuracy in the during-tDCS task period (r = -0.50; p = 0.024), however, this association did not quite reach significance in the post-tDCS task period (r = -0.44; p = 0.050) – see Fig 5 .

As the salting continued, the pH values of the raw and cooked egg whites showed a trend in which there was a significant decrease (P < 0.05), followed by a basically stable pH during the late stage of salting.

Meanwhile, when covariates were included, 7,350 genes were nominally significant (p < 0.05), and 5,532 genes remained significant after multiple comparison correction (padj < 0.05).

Furthermore, the results of the t-test confirm that these findings are highly significant (p values <0.05) for the right eye stimulation but not for the left eye (except for BlueL Ctx).

102 pg/ml, P = 0.011) with a trend toward significance at day 56 (52 vs. 87 pg/ml, P = 0.050) ( Fig 3A ).

The expression profile of NFE2L2 target genes ( Fig 4A ) demonstrates a majority of such genes to have highly significant differences in mean expression between MR and Control samples (adjusted p ≤ 0.05 for 18/21 genes) with moderate to large effect sizes (absolute fold-changes 2-fold or higher).

Taking the differences clearly leads to mean and variance stationary data, as a comparison of the three left panels of Figure 2 (original data) with its three right ones (differenced data) shows: all statistical tests (slope tests, Levene-s tests) reveal that none of the differenced TS show either a significant trend ( p <0.05) or heteroscedasticity ( p >0.1).

The Kruskal-Wallis test (KW) [ 53 ] and IM analysis of the same blue mold lesion diameter data using the GMAL4593 linkage map containing SSR, SNPlex, HRM, and GBS markers identified highly significant ( P= 0.05) associations between resistance to blue mold and markers on LG3 in all of the datasets except 2012 ( Fig 4B ).

Moderately significant T-cell proliferations were recorded in hamsters treated with free-CpG-ODN-2006 (Group III, p<0.05), lipo-CpG-ODN-2006 (Group IV, p<0.05), free-CpG-ODN-2006 plus miltefosine (Group V, p<0.01) and sub-curative miltefosine alone (Group VII, p<0.01) groups at day 4 post treatment in both ConA and SLA stimulated cells ( Figure 3A ).

The findings for ‘own promotion’ indicated that detailing produced a highly significant positive impact on new prescriptions for Lipitor and Crestor (p<0.05), while results were not significant for Vytorin. ‘Competitive’ detailing had a significant negative impact on new prescription for Vytorin (p<0.05) whereas results were not significant for the other two brands.

We also compared strain-specific nad5 Δ mtDNA transmission biases to starting nad5 Δ mtDNA levels at G0 ( Figure 4b ) and discovered a negative correlation between these two variables (Spearman rank correlation = −0.80) which was weakly significant ( P = 0.05).

For the trend analysis, the polynomial regression model was used, and a significant trend was considered when the estimated model obtained a p value <0.05.

cleared HCV were marginally significant ( P = 0.05), whereas differences between women with chronic HCV vs.

Marginal significance was found between Flat Rock West and Shag Rock West (t = 2.908, p = 0.05) with the former site having a higher proportion of algae.

The decompensated cirrhosis group scored lower in all domains than the compensated cirrhosis group, but all of the differences did not reach statistical significance except for the SS domain and the overall score (p<0.05).

Although both trials showed a trend for higher oocyst intensities in A. funestus , the difference was not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney P >0.05).