Excerpts

A correlation analysis between slope and temperature did not show a significant trend in slope as a function of temperature (r = 0.73, P>0.05).

The data were considered significant and highly significant for P <0.05 and P <0.01, respectively.

Twenty-three out of 39 SNPs were at least nominally significant (p<0.05) in the current study; all 23 had directions of effect consistent with the previous reports.

Nominally significant (P< 0.05) results were included only when significant (P< 0.01) miRNAs were identified in other tissues.

A second linear regression model revealed that there was a nearly significant interaction between gender and SSI scores in predicting caregiving responsibilities ( β = -.58, p = .05).

The greater increase in serum concentration of MCP-1 in CONV-R mice compared to GF mice at this time point did not reach statistical significance (117.9±19.55 pg/ml CONV-R vs. 57.53±8.61 pg/ml GF, P = .05).

The differences between Q1 group and Q2 group in Wbc count, Hb, Mono count, Eos count, BMI, waist, COPD, DM, CVD, hypertension, smoking status, asthma, stroke, race, education, and sex were statistically highly significant (all P < 0.05).

The TOC, TN and soil moisture did not display a significant trend along the elevation gradient ( p > 0.05).

parviglumis was highly significant ( X 2 = 113, p-value < 0.05).

The main effect of identity strength was marginally significant [ F (4.467,31.266) = 3.651 P <0.05].

Furthermore, a weighted polygenic risk score (PRS) made from the 18 SNPs common between the two datasets showed a nominally significant association ( P < 0.05) with the oral glucose tolerance test derived variables area under the curve (AUC) for insulin, AUC for insulin/AUC for glucose, insulin at 30 minutes and insulin sensitivity index ( S6 Table ).

Contact with goats showed the strongest association with TB (OR=2.81, 95% CI: 0.78–9.37, p = 0.089), which reached marginal significance after adjustment for age and sex (aOR=3.03, 95% CI: 1.00–9.17, p = 0.050).

Significant differences were observed in Lymph % and Lymph_inside % in tissues from patients with different vital statuses ( P < 0.05), and highly significant differences were observed for Lymph_border % and Lymph_outside % ( P < 0.05; Fig 5B ).

The severity of liver damage is associated with high risk for OSA and lower oxygen saturation In the entire cohort of 126 patients the prevalence of F2-F4 fibrosis was higher in patients at high risk compared to those without high risk for OSA (80.6% vs 57.8%, p = 0.006), this association remaining marginally significant after adjusting for confounders (O.R. 2.25, 95%C.I. 0.97–5.22; p = 0.05) ( Table 2 ).

Treatments with 10 nM and 100 nM inhibitor did not reach statistical significance (i.e., P <0.05).

Statistical significance was determined by p-values, with p < 0.01 indicating an extremely significant difference and p < 0.05 indicating a significant difference among groups.

That is, although differences between the two sites were only marginally significant, L. variegata seemed more strongly limited by PO 4 3− (Two Proportion Z-test; Z = 1.90; df = 70; P = 0.05) and less strongly limited by NO 3 − (Two Proportion Z-test: Z = −1.79; df = 70; P = 0.07) at Buoy 0 than at Playa Kalki ( Fig. 6 ).

Four weakly significant, positive correlations were found between the questionnaire data of lateral preferences and laterality tasks (Ear-VHF picture: r = .21, p = .05; Ear-VHF word: r = .26, p = .01; Eye-VHF word: r = .24, p = .02; DL-Eye: r = .22, p = .03) and three stronger correlations with the VHF face accuracies (Total EHI: r = -.29, p < .01; Hand: r = -.32, p < .01; Foot: r = -.31, p < .01).

F st values obtained in pairwise comparisons among the sites were also low ( Table 3 ), although seven values were individually significant (six at P <0.01 and one at P <0.05) and a further seven approached significance (0.08< P <0.05).

Individually significant F st values were only found in pairwise comparisons involving Anchorage Island (Binomial proportions test, P <0.05) and this pattern became even stronger when marginally significant P -values (0.08< P <0.05) were taken into account (14/21 versus 0/15 for comparisons excluding Anchorage; Binomial proportions test, P = 0.0002).

Finally, the model displays a marginally significant interaction between harmfulness and size, β = -0.98, se = 0.38, t(2068.94) = -2.57, p < .05.

This difference was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.77, df = 1, P = 0.05).

In the core system of face perception, 4 of 9 subjects had highly significant ( p <0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons) activity in the bilateral occipital face area (OFA) and fusiform face area (FFA).

For glutamic acid + glutamine, there was an increasing trend in measured levels as dietary protein had increased, which led to P55 having the highest content in comparison to other treatment groups (p<0.05).

Significant correlations in the study There were highly significant positive correlations between AADAC gene expression and both tumor grades (r = .603, p<0.05) and tumor stages (r = .756, p<0.001) and there was a significant negative correlation between PLEKHS1 gene expression and tumor grades (r = -.462, p<0.05) while CDKN3 gene expressions had no significant correlations with tumor grades and stages.