Of the brain regions that loaded negatively on the first principal component ( Figure 2A ), ratings of Pain positively correlated with brain activity in left insula (pearson's r = 0.44, p<0.002), right insula (r = 0.43) and AMCC (r = 0.47), and showed a positive trend in lSII (r = 0.26, p<0.05) and rSII (r = 0.25, p<0.05); none of these brain regions were positively correlated with Suffering.
Excerpts
Block II sequences (672 bp) showed highly significant negative values of Tajima's D (-1.9064, P<0.05) and Fu & Li's F (-7.1944, P<0.02), while motif II sequences (24 bp) showed significant positive values of Tajima's D (2.7062, P<0.05) and Fu & Li's F (1.3084, P>0.05).
Of the brain regions that loaded positively on the first principal component ( Figure 2B ), on the other hand, ratings of Suffering were significantly correlated with activity in the left anterior thalamus (r = 0.33) and DMPFC (r = 0.38), and showed a positive trend in the right anterior thalamus (r = 0.22, p<0.05); none of these brain regions were positively correlated with Pain, but the DMPFC showed a negative trend with ratings of Pain (r = −0.22, p<0.05).
The STRUCTURE clustering was supported by pairwise F ST values which were highly significant between all species and subspecies (0.13 ≤ F ST ≤ 0.41; P -value < 0.05).
Significant ( * ) and highly significant ( ** ) correlations were correlated when P-value < 0.05 and < 0.01 respectively. 2.10.
The γ parameters in Heckman models are small and only marginally significant (Model 10: ρ = 0.158, p < 0.05), suggesting limited selection bias.
In the peri-infarcted zone, the percentage of apoptotic cells in groups ADSCs and Ex-ADSCs showed a decreasing trend compared with PBS group (131.5±19.3/mm 2 , 87.1±14.4/mm 2 vs. 178.3±26.4/mm 2 , p <0.05.
a clear trendgold
There was a clear trend for an increase in mean overall performance (left panel) between testing at 7 months of age and 15 months of age which was significant for the control mice and the Swede mice (Spearman, 0.89≤ r s ≤0.94, p<0.05), but fell short of significance for the Tau mice (Spearman, r s = 0.66, p>0.05).
The difference to the private condition was marginally significant ( t (60) = 1.98, p = .05, 95% [-0.01, 1.15], d = 0.254).
Among these results, we also report a near-significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis test, W = 5.96, df = 2, P = 0.05) in the maximum crown diameter of the trees between the three genetic clusters when analyzing forest variables only.
showed a trendP > 0.05
Although treatment with GLS or GLF showed a trend reducing the tumor multiplicity ( Fig 2C ) ( P > 0.05), their tumor incidence data overlap with the UV only group ( Fig 2B ).
Quantification of inflammatory cell aggregates (a hallmark of NASH) revealed that lobular inflammation was reduced by intervention with propagermanium ( Fig 4C ), with borderline significant effect of early propagermanium treatment ( p = 0.05 for HFD+Pro_6wk and p = 0.18 for HFD+Pro_12wk, respectively).
Time-series analysis of the daily number of Web site visits shows a highly significant treatment effect ( p <.05), though the absolute size of this effect is small, an increase of 512 visits per day (± 149 visits).
In the Cox-PH analysis, along with a focused MMS, the ages of the patients at the initial diagnosis and a binary measurement variable indicating the presence of somatic mutation on TP53 gene, which had a modestly significant (p<0.05) effect on the patient survival as shown in our preliminary analysis of the same data, were included as covariates.
marginally non-significantp = 0.05
Results Immune Priming and Serratia Marcescens Infections For Experiment 1 ( Figure 1A, B ), the minimal model indicated a marginally non-significant interaction between aphid genotype, pre-exposure, and infection treatment upon second challenge (p = 0.05), which is reflected by the somewhat different responses of the two aphid genotypes (5A0, LSR1) to pre-exposure and subsequent live bacterial challenge ( Figure 1A,B ).
Retest), Frequency, and Group was marginally significant [ F (30,375)=1.49; p =.05].
The chi-square test was marginally significant, χ 2 (2) = 5.87, p = .05.
All correlation between these tests were low and did not reach statistical significance (R 2 ≤ 0.038, p <0.05).
The relationship between number of lymph nodes retrieved and RFS was marginally significant (P = 0.05, Fig. 3 ).
of borderline significancep = 0.050
Among CM CD4+ T cells, the relationship between MDA and P-STAT5 was of borderline significance (p = 0.050) when controlling for plasma HIV RNA copy numbers.
We found many bacterial species that exhibited highly significant correlations to these traits ( Fig 5A–5C , 967, 720, 1,056 bacteria out of the top 1,345 occurring bacteria had significant Spearman correlation, P-value < 0.05 after FDR correction for age, HbA1C% and BMI respectively, S12–S17 Tables in S2 File ).
The P n and PE values of the cotton leaves in the salt dust treatment groups all showed a decreasing trend compared to the control with significant differences between groups A and (B, C), and D, and E, and F ( P <0.05), but no significant differences were observed between groups B and C.
Meanwhile, when covariates were included, 7,350 genes were nominally significant (p < 0.05), and 5,532 genes remained significant after multiple comparison correction (padj < 0.05).
At a group level, there was a marginally significant difference between the mean horizontal positions for left vs right cues ( t = 2.15, p < 0.05), but the overall evidence was not compelling ( l o g 10 B F 10 = 0.19).
The environmental variables NDWI and NDVI were also included in the multivariate regression given their near significance ( p = 0.05).