A similar pattern was observed in model A where the openness trait showed a statistical trend (aOR = 2.46, 0.95–6.35, P = 0.06).
Excerpts
Even though the significance was lost in the fully adjusted model, a strong trend ( P = 0.06) for a positive association between serum DMA concentration and increased cIMT was still apparent.
There is a significant difference when comparing the mean RMCBS slopes of symptomatic infected C57BL/6 and infected balb/c (p = 0.01); a significant difference when comparing symptomatic infected C57BL/6 and non-infected C57BL/6 controls (p = 0.004); a marginally significant difference (p = 0.06) when comparing symptomatic infected C57BL/6 with asymptomatic infected C57BL/6; a non-significant difference when comparing infected balb/c and non-infected control balb/c (p = 0.48); and a non-significant difference (p = 0.70) when comparing infected balb/c with asymptomatic infected C57BL/6 and non-infected control C57BL/6.
In the WT -treated group, this effect was borderline significant ( WT vs. medium P = 0.06 ) ( Figure 3B ).
Parent specific effects were not found in our sample, a GLM including parent (father/mother) as additional factor did not show a significant effect for parent , ( F (1,45) = 0.099, p = 0.75), while the main effect group and the interaction effect group × parenting style remained unchanged; the marginally significant main effect parenting style was not significant anymore, p = 0.06, due to model complexity.
approached significancep = 0.06
In comparison, the mean difference for L+M pairs approached significance in the opposite direction (mean = -0.034, t 56 = -1.9, p = 0.06).
In a similar vein, trials where the last author was a statistician/other technical as contrasted to those where he/she was a psychiatrist/MD showed a borderline significant trend of favoring pharmacotherapy (b = -0.26, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.01, p = 0.06).
For caecal samples no significant effect of both dietary factors were observed but a possible trend for a change in the bacterial community structure with addition of phytase became evident by PCoA ( Fig 4 ) as well as by ANOSIM ( R = 0.136, p = 0.06).
While there was a marginally significant correlation between the two outcome variables ( r = .32, p = .06), a sobel test [43] showed that the effect of social comparison (dummy coded as −2 for same-gender comparison, and +1 for opposite-gender and no comparison control) on visual self-representation was not mediated by explicit self-ratings, z = .84, p = .40.
pyrrithrix : X 2 = 4.99, P = 0.026), and there was a nonsignificant trend in the same direction for H . hallani ( H . hallani : X 2 = 3.53, P = 0.060).
Although the result was not quite statistically significant (p = 0.06), the statistical power was limited by the relatively smaller sample size (n = 35) compared to that of the present study (n = 167).
After adjustments, the association of birth weight was rendered to a moderately significant trend (adjusted P -values<0.06), the association of birth length remained unaltered, and the association of head circumference became significant from a non-significant trend (adjusted P -values<0.05) ( Table 3 ).
Conversely, TLR4 expression decreased dose-dependently with significantly more TLR4 expression seen in 1 ng/ml (p = 0.004) and with marginal significance at 5 ng/ml HMGB1-stimulation (p = 0.06) ( Figure 2E ). 3.5 HMGB1 induces Pp38 MAPK pathway To better understand the MAPK pathway activation by HMGB1, a semi quantitative assessment of phosphorylated (P) MAPK proteins was carried out.
None of the plasma preparations’ βTG levels correlated with whole blood platelet count, while the correlation of PAI-1 ag of the 200 g plasma with whole blood platelet count, reached borderline significance (r = 0.4, p = 0.06).
Although STI incidence between sites was relatively similar, there was a nonsignificant trend towards a greater incidence of multiple active STIs at the eThekwini site compared to the Tshwane site (48.9/100wy and 8.3/100wy respectively; S4 Table , p = 0.06).
For the indoor group, the intervention had only a marginally significant effect [b = 8.133, t(194.52) = 1.89, p = .060].
IL-6 (but not CRP) was a marginally significant predictor ( P = 0.06) of GFDCAV at 5 years ( Table 3 ).
The d′ results showed nearly significant or significant main effects of attractiveness, F (1, 34) = 3.68, p = .06, and distinctiveness, F (1, 34) = 7.00, p <.05.
Smoking was also less prevalent in the placebo group; the difference was marginally significant (χ 2 df = 1 = 3.5, p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ).
approached significancep = .06
However, there was an Experiment×Region×Question phase interaction that approached significance, F (2,116) = 2.96, p = .06, η p 2 = 0.05.
As we had already reported in our previous paper [ 19 ], there was a significant decrease in need satisfaction for belonging, F (1,14) = 19.64, p = .001, η p 2 = .58, self-esteem, F (1,14) = 4.89, p = .04, η p 2 = .26, and control, F (1,14) = 7.21, p = .02, η p 2 = .34, and a nearly significant reduction for meaningful existence, F (1,14) = 4.12, p = .06, η p 2 = .23, after exclusion in the Cyberball group.
r = .125 was, however, marginally significant ( p = .06) and in the predicted direction.
In separate models with log transformed adduct and metabolite values as the exposure variables, the direction and significance of the associations between adducts and outcomes were the same as the models with the dichotomized exposure with the exception of the CBCL DSM-oriented attention deficit hyperactivity scale raw score and CPRS DSM-IV Total scale raw score, which became borderline significant (p = 0.06, and p = 0.08, respectively) (data not shown).
There was a borderline significant result for age (p = 0.06), reflecting the fact that breast density can be decreased with age although there is significant variability between patients.
showed a trendp = 0.06
Up284 significantly reduced tumor burden (p = 0.002) and showed a trend for prolonged survival compared to vehicle treated group (p = 0.06) ( Fig 6D–6F ).