The second test, which reached significance in the German sample (S = 0.72, p < 0.001) and approached significance in the underpowered Croatian sample (S = 0.90, p = 0.06), provided direct support for the second part of H2: higher global network strength was observed among partnered compared to non-partnered participants in both countries (Germany: M partnered = 3.81 vs.
Though temperature exposure was not significantly associated with birth weight in models testing its effect in the full sample or the non-Indigenous subset, mean temperature exposure over the course of entire pregnancy was borderline significant predictor of birth weight in the Batwa subset (p = 0.06).
The difference between conditions in attributing ethnic stereotypes to environmental causes was marginally significant, F(2, 1157) = 2.82, p = .060, η 2 = .005.
A main effect of group ( F (1,120) = 15.56, p < 0.001), and an almost significant main effect of time ( F (2,120) = 2.88, p = 0.06) also emerged.
IL-1Ra showed a trend (p = 0.06) to be decreased in elderly women.
Using obese individuals as the reference group, normal weight individuals demonstrated a borderline non-significant trend for weight gain (2.6 kg, SE = 1.4, p = 0.06) and overweight individuals had a significant weight gain (2.6 kg, SE = 1.1, p = 0.02).
In addition, Bhlhe41 mRNA levels trended towards an increase that was not quite significant (15% upregulated p = 0.06) ( Fig 6 ).
But the searching slope for Chinese subjects was steeper than that for Black subjects, with a marginally significant interaction of Set size and Race of participant, F (2, 82) = 2.93, p = .06, η p 2 = .07.
-13.55±12.48%, p = 0.04; Fig 2 ) and a statistical trend towards a postprocedural improvement in R t V global longitudinal strain (-8.24±6.25% vs. -13.47±7.61%, p = 0.06).
Item 1 showed nearly significant illusionary effects in the minimum delay condition (score = 1.00±1.57, t(17) = 2.70, P = 0.06, corrected; P<0.01, uncorrected), but failed to show differences between conditions (F(5, 85) = 0.37, P>0.1).
Finally, the interaction between Task and Block was also statistically significant in SDNN F (2.88, 69.05) = 3.26, p = .028, η 2 p = .12 and marginally significant in rMSSD F (2.59, 62.28) = 2.67, p = .06, η 2 p = .10.
Spatial position (right/left) presented a marginally significant effect ( F (1,33) = 3.63, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.1), right spatial position tending to be associated with shorter response times.
However, the interaction between instruction and stimulation was only marginally significant, F (1,19) = 3.99, p = .06, MSE = 1.24, η p 2 = .17.
In addition, we found a near-significant advantage for men relative to women ( r = -0.16, 95% CI [-0.31, 0.01], p = 0.06, n = 149, Fig 3B ).
The main effect of manipulation almost reached significance (F(1,140) = 3.68, p = 0.06).
Compared to nonsmokers, smokers demonstrated higher FA in the right ACb (t(19) = 2.34, p = 0.02), and a strong trend toward higher FA within the left ACb (t(19) = 2.0, p = 0.06, Figure 1 ).
sH1N1 FluoroSpot revealed no significant changes in IFNγ SFCs after either dose of vaccine ( Fig 3C ), but exhibited a marginally significant increase in GrB SFCs post-dose 1 (p = 0.06; Fig 3D ).
Furthermore the Face x Sentence x Age interaction was marginally significant ( p = .06, cf. the blue bars in Fig. 6 ): In the negative sentence conditions, the negative (vs. positive) face did not appear to affect accuracy in the young group ( M = .88, SE = 0.03 vs.
In a statistical trend, Rb1 treatment lowered p-IκBα expression in epididymal adipose tissue (−21%; p = 0.06, Fig. 3A ).
Without statistical difference, an increasing trend of fibrosis score in the liver tissues from OLETF rats was reversed by 6-week rimonabant administration (P = 0.06, Fig 3C and 3D ).
The Malawi before-after study showed a trend towards lower mortality during the intervention period (28.6 vs. 36.9/1000 at baseline, p = 0.06), and lower infection-attributable mortality (2.4 vs. 7.3/1000, p<0.005).
For lexical syllables fu1 , fu4 , and fu6 , the contrast between fu1 and fu6 elicited a significant negative cluster with a time window during 102–188 ms (post-divergence point unless specified otherwise) typical of an MMN (sum-T = −7.92, p <.01), and a marginally significant positive cluster (232–350 ms; sum-T = 5.04, p = .060) in the control group, which can be considered a P3a.
A marginally significant interaction between Night and Condition (F1, 28 = 3.7; p = 0.06) was not supported by Tukey’s post-hoc comparisons (RS group: N-2 = 8h15min ± 1h05min, N-1 = 7h38min ± 1h18min, SD group: N-2 = 7h58 ± 59min, N-1 = 8h11min ± 1h13min, all ps > 0.23).
PERMANOVA analysis of the overall suite of innate immune defenses detected significant differences between fallow deer and elk (p = 0.021) and fallow deer and sika (p = 0.021) and borderline significance between cervids and bovids (p = 0.06), but small sample sizes may have obfuscated other significant variation.
Due to the low number of cases, group differences were marginally significant in 2004 (χ 2 (2) = 3.53; p = 0.06) and were significant in 2018 (χ 2 (2) = 8.44; p<0.01).