Excerpts

On the other hand, the effects of the simple intervention on O 2 Hb approached significance ( B = –3.20 × 10 −07 mol/L, 95% CI [-6.54 × 10 −07 , 0.15 × 10 −07 ], p = 0.061; simple intervention < control).

In cohort B, a trend toward differential survival in favor of hysterectomy was observed with marginal significance ( P = 0.061).

In the SCOT-HEART (Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart) trial of 4146 patients with stable chest pain CCTA was associated with an apparent increase in coronary revascularization when compared to ICA (11.2% vs 9.7%), although this fell just short of statistical significance (P = 0.061).

An interaction between Feed Valence and Block Type did not quite reach significance ( F (1, 27) = 3.81, p = .061, η p 2 = .124), but generally it appeared that there was a greater difference between P3b amplitudes to gains and losses when stimulus values varied (Gain: M = 0.77, SE = 0.24; Loss: M = 0.20, SE = 0.32), compared to when stimulus values output a constant reward rate (Gain: M = 0.51, SE = 0.34; Loss: M = 0.35, SE = 0.25).

During Period 1 there was also a suggestive but not significant increases in odds of SINT cases being born in a locale with mining activities, including coal mining (1.95 with 95% CI of 0.97 to 3.92, p = 0.061), hard rock mining (1.38 with 95% CI of 0.97 to 1.97, p = 0.075), and uranium mining (2.70 with 95% CI of 0.86 to 8.48, p = 0.088).

The continuous, correlational analysis combining Learners and Non-Learners showed a nearly significant, positive correlation between accuracy in the last block and changes in the N1 component, (rho = 0.327, p = 0.061, 95% CI = -0.117–0.648).

Table 5 shows an association between PA and lower TC/HDL-C ratio of borderline significance (p = 0.061) (Model 1).

A marginally significant effect of emotion was found on the accuracy of identifying the violations of -o usage, F (1, 53) = 3.56, p = .061.

Two high-density hotspots within the same area, north and south of the road, were close to significance (z = 1.873, p = 0.061).

Furthermore, one mutation site was associated with survival at a borderline significance level: 1485 (RR, 2.461; 95% CI, 0.960–6.309; P = 0.061), without amino acid substitution in the RH domain ( Table 3 ).

There was a significant main effect of test condition on HR change (p = 0.038) and borderline significant main effect of test condition on SV change (p = 0.061), whereby they were reduced with ACB actuation during HUT1, walk and HUT2 ( Fig 5A and 5B ).

Nominally significant parental genetic effects were found between the SNPs rs11191548 ( CYP17A1 ) (paternal, β = 2.78±1.49, P = 6.1×10 −2 for SBP and β = 3.60±1.24, P = 3.7×10 −3 for DBP), rs17367504 ( MTHFR ) (paternal, β = 2.42±0.93, P = 9.3×10 −3 for SBP and β = 1.89±0.80, P = 1.8×10 −2 for DBP and maternal, β = -1.32±0.60, P = 2.9×10 −2 and β = -1.97±0.77, P = 1.0×10 −2 , for SBP and DBP respectively) and child blood pressure.

C-statistics showed marginally significant improvement by using GRS ( P = 0.061), whereas IDI and NRI showed a significant improvement (P = 0.0028 and < 0.0001, respectively).

When participants were in a concrete mind-set, they allocated more money to luxurious consumption ( M = 2919.44, SD = 285.99) than people in an abstract mind-set ( M = 2008.11, SD = 282.1), p = .026, as well as allocated less money to long-term savings ( M = 4708.56, SD = 408.09) than people in an abstract mind-set ( M = 5797.3, SD = 402.54), although this effect was only marginally significant, p = .061.

In contrast, for the PD group, there was a significant positive correlation between the Stroop inhibition score and the unrelated N400 in the right central region (R = .588, p = .017), while the same correlation in the right parietal region fell just outside significance ( p = .061).

The effect of time on belief in free will controlling for political orientation was trending towards significance in Study 1 (p = .190) and reduced to marginal significance in Study 2 (p = .061).

Thus, in the Pre-Pyrenees, there are statistically significant differences, especially in the case of the bearded vulture (average growth with wild ungulates only: −5±6%, growth in the real scenario: 4±3%, P = 0.028) and the griffon vulture (with wild ungulates only: 0.03±9%, growth in the real scenario: 10±1.6%, P = 0.039), being marginally significant in the case of the Egyptian vulture (with wild ungulates only: −2±8%, growth in the real scenario: 6±0.8%, P = 0.061).

In fact, Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc t-tests revealed a marginally significant difference between left-averted and direct gaze trials ( p = .061) and a significant difference between right-averted and direct gaze trials ( p = .040), but no difference between the two averted gaze conditions ( p > .9).

A group*trial interaction approached significance ( F (3,52) = 2.600, p = 0.061).

When severity was controlled for, this significant interaction between group and condition approached significance (F(1,27) = 3.84, p = 0.061).

In our study PIK3CA mutations were equally frequent in pTa, pT1 and ≥pT2 tumors, however the correlation of PIK3CA mutations with low grade was close to significance (p = 0.061).

On the univariate level, this difference was statistically significant for plan , F (1, 62) = 10.34, p < .001, η p 2 = .14, and marginally significant for pain , F (1, 62) = 3.64, p = .061, η p 2 = .06.

This increase approached significance for ISL1 (22.1% vs 36.5%, p = 0.061).

= 1, p = 0.021); (ii) juveniles showed a marginally non-significant tendency to learn faster than adults ( Fig 3B ; Χ 2 = 3.5, d.f. = 1, p = 0.061); but there was no effect of (iii) sex ( Fig 3C ; Χ 2 = 0.4, d.f. = 1, p = 0.547), or of (iv) exploration score on learning rate in the field ( Fig 3D ; Χ 2 = 0.97, d.f. = 1, p = 0.326) (see also Tables B-E in S2 Text ).

After three days, for the first CT1 mutant line ( SLC6A8 Δex10-11/y ), we observed a 3.5-fold increase in intracellular creatine although this increase just failed to reach statistical significance ( Fig 4C , 4.2 vs 1.2 nmoles/mg protein relative to empty vector controls, P = 0.061, two-sided t-test).