Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

a strong trendp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Myonuclear domain size, defined as the fiber CSA per nuclei, was maintained in type I (pre: 1409.6±72.5 μm 2 /nuclei; post: 1341.1±61.5 μm 2 /nuclei) and in type II fibres (pre: 1799.6±96.7 μm 2 /nuclei; post: 1987.1±111.8 μm 2 /nuclei), with an increase in the number of nuclei per muscle cross section of type I fibres (pre: 3.9±0.2; post: 4.6±0.2; p<0.05) and a strong trend for an increase in type II fibres (pre: 3.6±0.2; post: 3.9±0.2; p = 0.07) observed with training ( Fig 2A and B ).
trending towards significancep = .071.4× alphagold
For the sample included in the free recall task, the groups presented a significant difference on age, F (3, 64) = 3.81, p = .014, η p 2 = .15, with simulators significantly younger than DID participants ( p = .03) and partial information comparisons ( p = .04), and trending towards significance when compared with full information comparisons ( p = .07).
A similar tendency for mice microinjected with AAV2/10-FHA- Pgc-1α and treated with MPTP to turn towards the ipilateral side again did not quite reach statistical significance when analyzed by comparing AAV2/10-FHA- Pgc-1α to AAV2/10- mCherry microinjected mice (95% CI −9.0 to 0.46; p = 0.07), potentially due to statistical noise introduced by varying levels of MPTP toxicity between animals.
approached significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Association of subarachnoid blood volume with neurosurgical patient outcomes Blood volume was not significantly associated with length of ITU stay (r = 0.16; p = 0.34), and there was no difference in mean blood volume between patients who subsequently died and those who did not, although this approached significance (fatality group: 77.9±43.9 cm 3 ; non-fatality group: 47.0±30.2 cm 3 ; t = 1.87; p = 0.07).
near-significantp=0.071.4× alphagold
-How might confounding variables may shift results showing survival analysis results demonstratinhg a near-significant difference in log-rank tests for DTR vs. non-DTR (p=0.07), especially given that logistic regression finds DTR to be a significant independent predictor. -Given the relatively advanced age and high comorbidity burden, do you have severity-of-illness scores (e.g., APACHE II, SOFA on admission)?