Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0761.5× alphagold
Table 3 reports the results of the effect modification analysis, which indicate a statistically significant change in the effect sizes for Hispanics (p<0.001) and a marginally significant change for non-Hispanic Asians (p = 0.076) between 2008 and 2018.
showed a trendP = 0.0761.5× alpha
Somewhat surprisingly, at 9 months, the Q175 Het and Hom mutants showed a trend towards better performance on the test than the WT controls ( F 2,22 = 2.935, P = 0.076), but this paradoxical finding was reversed by 12 months, where there was a gene dose-dependent decline in motor function ( Fig. 6A ; F 2,22 = 11.557, P <0.001) with post hoc comparisons revealing that Het mice performed worse than WT ( t = 2.419, P = 0.025) and Hom mice performed worse than both age-matched Het and WT mice ( vs Het t = 2.225, P = 0.0378; vs WT t = 4.806, P = 0.017).
highly significantp = 0.0761.5× alphaqualifiedgold
Regarding the main effect for Category , t-tests between the levels of this factor revealed highly significant differences for all contrasts except for the contrast pain-related vs. negative words (t = -1.86; p = 0.076).
showed a trendp = 0.07631.5× alpha
In TCGA database, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve for lung adenocarcinoma patients showed a trend toward poorer survival in H63D HFE variants compared to WT HFE patients (p = 0.0763) ( Fig 3A ).
a trend towards significanceP = 0.07641.5× alpha
When including the imputed data, a trend towards significance was noted for the univariable analysis of the MDM2 G allele ( P = 0.0764 unadjusted and P = 0.1067 adjusted analysis) ( Table 2 ), but carriers of a G allele had a 1.58 fold increased risk for cancer after adjusting for sex, race, birth year, and effects from other polymorphisms in multivariable analysis ( P = 0.0313) ( Table 3 ).
almost reached significanceP = 0.0771.5× alpha
No relation between study size (regression coefficient = −0.109, 95% CI: −0.231, 0.012; P = 0.075, baseline depression severity (regression coefficient = 0.026, 95% CI: −0.007, 0.060; P = 0.116), trial duration (regression coefficient = −0.058, 95% CI: −0.153, 0.038; P = 0.223), age of patients (regression coefficient = 0.013, 95% CI: −0.10, 0.036; P = 0.879), and study quality (regression coefficient = −0.142, 95% CI: −0.357, 0.072; P = 0.183) and omega-3 PUFA efficacy was found, despite study quality almost reached significance when considered only for RCTs conducted on patients with MDD (regression coefficient = −0.403, 95% CI: −0.857, 0.052; P = 0.077).