Excerpts

The two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated a marginally significant main effect of stage (F (1, 18) = 3.24, p < 0.1) and a significant marginally interaction between group and stage (F (1, 18) = 3.04, p < 0.1).

A second measure of demand generation—exposure to family planning messages in the media at the community level—did not have the expected relationship in the multivariate model, only reaching modest significance (p < .10) in Burkina Faso, Uganda, and Kenya with regard to short-acting contraceptive use and Ghana with regard to long-acting method use.

The effect of water addition on species richness was marginally significant ( P <0.1) depending on N treatments in the steppe but independent of N treatments in the old field ( Table 1 ).

However, none of the CRE sites show significant enrichment ( Table 1 ), though three of the four are near significance (0.05<p<0.1).

Our results showed a trend for suitable environment having an impact on response to the object and noise aggregate indicator (P = 0.1).

However, the background MG activity exhibited a nonsignificant trend of increasing by 43% (p = 0.10), consistent with a small forward shift in the initial postural lean from −1.78±2.24 cm to 0.10±2.02 cm (p = 0.63).

However, at 0.15–0.3-m depth the correlation with the sum of silt and clay content was only marginally significant (P = 0.1).

In addition, 31% of corals from Butaritari (N = 13) had partial mortality scars associated with the 2004 bleaching event, while none from Abaiang and North Tarawa showed such scars (N = 12); this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.10, permutation test).

An increased trend for inter-group connectivities was found for groups A; this increase is marginally significant (p<0.1) and could be interpreted as increased communicative activity within the higher-order executive control group that was induced by the cognitive load of deception.

A marginally significant relationship (p≤0.1) was found between high stress at work and sICAM-1 (9% higher levels), and this relationship was unchanged by the addition of health behaviors ( Table 2 ).

A two-sided t -test indicated that the difference between these two means was marginally significant ( t 4341 = 1.29; p = .10).

The MENO group showed a trend towards a higher frequency of subjective memory complaints compared to PRE women and men (p ≤ .10).

When we regressed GPA on the three future self-identification components, the overall regression model was marginally significant, F (3, 520) = 2.08, p = .10, R 2 = .01.

After incorporating interactions between bone lead and genotypes into the models, we found that 5 and 4 polymorphisms reached statistical significance (p<0.05) and borderline significance (p<0.1), respectively, when genotypes were modeled as additive ( Table 3 ).

For the tone condition, the difference fell short of significance: χ 2 = 6.32, d.f. = 3, p = .10, but for the syllable condition, the difference was highly significant, χ 2 = 14.7, d.f. = 3, p = .002.

Analyses of the variability of reaction time (measured as a subject's standard deviation of reaction time) revealed a marginally significant main effect of timbre [ F (3,81) = 2.20, p <0.1]; post-hoc tests determined that response times were marginally more variable during flute-tone discrimination than during pure-tone discrimination ( Table 2 ; p <0.08); no other significant differences were found.

The difference between group B and group D is significant on day 1 (p <0.05) and nearly significant on day 7 and day 14 (p < 0.1).

All covariates that were statistically significant or approached significance at p<0 . 10 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariable analysis.

Yet the effect for ghost authors is not significant at the conventional p < 0.05 level but only marginally significant at p < 0.1.

Correlation analysis of the frontopolar cortex with the palatability rating revealed a negative Spearman’s Rho correlation of r = −0.8 which was significant at the trend level (p = 0.10).

One factor demonstrated a statistical trend (0.05< P <0.10): chronic kidney disease (yes vs. no; P = 0.081).

Samples from leprosy patients showed down-regulation of CCL2, CCL3, CCL4 (p<0.05), while IL1β and SOD2 were borderline significant (p<0.1), confirming a repression of these genes by M. leprae ex vivo , as was observed in vitro in THP-1 ( Figure 2 ).

F2-isoprostane concentrations were significantly negatively correlated with telomere length in the combined sample (F = 4.78, p<0.01, controlling for age and sex), but this relationship was only marginally significant in the separate depressed (F = 2.59, p<0.10) and control groups (F = 2.31, p = 0.13) due to low statistical power.

Neither model comparison was found to significantly improve the overall fit, although both showed a trend towards significance (0.05 < p < 0.10).

And the group differences of C net and E local at some K cost points were significant ( P <0.05, uncorrected) or marginally significant ( P <0.1, uncorrected).