Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0481.0× alphagold
PWA during rest was significantly larger compared to both memory (t(77) = 4.152, p < 0.001, d = 0.473) and control tasks (t(77) = 3.844, p < 0.001, d = 0.438), while the difference between memory and control tasks was marginally significant (t(77) = 2.007, p = 0.048, d = 0.229).
marginally significantp =.0481.0× alphagold
For the SI group, the model was: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:logit\left(P\right(Y=1\left)\right)=-0.46+0.10X$$\end{document} showing a marginally significant positive slope ( p =.048), while the intercept was not significant ( p =.13).
marginal significancep = 0.0491.0× alphagold
The two groups showed marginal significance in sex ratio (healthy subjects: 68.1% male subjects; psychosis: 83.1% male subjects; χ 2 1 = 3.87, p = 0.049), and the WASI FSIQ (four subtests) in the schizophrenia group was significantly lower than that in the healthy group (healthy subjects: 111.79 ± 11.92; psychosis: 100.89 ± 16.87; t 119 = −4.10, p < 0.001).
borderline significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
Reverse MR analyses were also performed to examine if BC influences CD40/CD40L levels.A borderline significant association was found between CD40 levels and overall BC risk (IVW OR 1.027, 95% CI 1.000–1.054, p = 0.049), with a more robust association observed for ER-positive BC (OR 1.048, 95% CI 1.016–1.082, p = 0.003).