Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Using the mentioned macronutrients and questionnaire derived intake variables as covariates in the analysis of disease‐associated shifts in microbial beta‐diversity yielded no significant associations ( P > 0.05, respectively) and also revealed only minor effects on the still highly significant change in community composition associated with PSC ( P = 0.003, R 2 = 0.019). 4 DISCUSSION It is unclear, to which extent reported single centre microbiota studies in PSC were influenced by environmental factors and whether reported associations would remain significant across different geographical regions.
an increasing trendP = 0.0030.1× alphagold
The Spearman’s correlation test for association between annual PTH rates and time (year) performed for the adult age group showed a statistically significant, mild to strongly positive correlation, indicating an increasing trend of adult PTH rates over time (year) (Rs = 0.64 [95% CI: 0.28 to 0.84], P = 0.003).
In the subgroup with COPD, the younger group took longer to return to their baseline COPD condition than the older age group ( P =0.004), as did hospitalized participants compared to nonhospitalized participants ( P =0.025), although these differences did not reach statistical significance when adjusted for multiplicity ( P <0.003).
Secondary research questions Energy content of highest ranked option Hypothesis 2: In Study 1, if the highest-ranked option was lower-energy, it was less likely – with an odds ratio of 0.80 (95%CIs: 0.67, 0.95; p = 0.013) – that the selected option matched that highest-ranked option, although this did not reach statistical significance at the pre-specified value of p < 0.003.
difference was apparentp = 0.0030.1× alphagold
As concern the speed, expressed as the number of inspected rows within the task time limit, a statistically significant difference was apparent between the two experimental sessions ( t 31 = 3.2; p = 0.003), as the subjects were faster in performing the test during T0 (mean ± SE = 19.12 ± 0.63) with respect to T1 (mean ± SE = 17.75 ± 0.7) (Fig. 1b ).