Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

moderately significantp < 0.00770.2× alphaqualifiedgold
3 (A and B) reveal a moderately significant interaction of variables A (pH) and B (incubation time), with modest curvature (p < 0.0077), indicating that pH 10.5 and incubation period between 61 and 66 h are favorable for enzyme yield but increasing pH and incubation time negatively affected the productivity.
approached significantP = 0.00770.2× alphagold
The expression of MDA-5 gene in bursa of Fabricius of both two breeds had a rising trend following infection with MDV, which approached significant in broilers at 7 and 21 d.p.i ( P = 0.0077 and P = 0.0185) and in Erlang mountainous chickens at 4 and 7 d.p.i ( P = 0.0042 and P = 0.0059).
highly significantp = 0.00780.2× alphaqualifiedgold
borderline significancep = 0.0481.0× alpha
A correlation between the in vitro culture and ex vivo proteomic levels was only seen for CCL5, CFD, and cystatin C/CST3; a highly significant correlation was seen for cystatin C/CST3 ( p = 0.0078, r = 0.65) whereas only borderline significance was reached for CCL5 ( p = 0.048, r = 0.79) and CFD ( p = 0.055, r = 0.55).
highly significantP = .00780.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Second, the observed difference in mRNA stability was highly significant (paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = .0078), with the mean half-life of nblA mRNA increasing approximately three-fold, rising from 3.03 min under NH 4 + conditions to 9.46 min after combined nitrogen removal (Fig. 4A ).
showed a trendp = 0.00780.2× alpha
Consistent with our results from the FLIC assay, SIFaR mutants showed a trend towards elevated food intake (Brown‐Forsythe ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of genotype on food consumption ( F 4,49.59 = 3.907, p = 0.0078), although individual pairwise comparisons did not maintain significance after multiple test correction; Figure 5D ).
highly significantP =0.00780.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, highly significant differences were observed in brachial pulse pressure between the groups, with higher daytime (58.5 versus 48.6 mm Hg; P =0.0078), nighttime (55.1 versus 45.3 mm Hg; P =0.0006), and 24‐hour (58.3 versus 47.5 mm Hg; P =0.0020) values in the diabetic group (Table 5 ).