“did not reach statistical significance”

In the efficacy group, the LV dimension increased as a function of time as follows: at 4 weeks, Z-scores for MV, AOV, AAO, and isthmus dimensions were significantly greater than those obtained prior to HO therapy (P < 0.01); at 8 weeks, although the MV, AOV, and AAO dimensions demonstrated an increasing trend that did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07, 0.06, 0.1, respectively), the Z-scores of the isthmus in the three-vessel and trachea view (3VT) views were significantly greater than those obtained at earlier time points (P < 0.05).

38 Health card status approached significance, with those without health cards showing a trend toward higher non-adherence (AOR=1.119, p=0.07), though this did not reach statistical significance.

Procedural details and emotional support approached significance ( p = 0.07), suggesting potential differences that did not reach statistical significance.

The right hippocampus also showed a positive trend ( r = 0.23, p = 0.07), but it did not reach statistical significance.

Both old and young experienced a similar absolute level of PFE at LONG muscle lengths, although old showed a trend toward greater PFE than young which did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.07) (Table 1 ), whereas at SHORT lengths old had significantly lower PFE ( P < 0.05).

However, pre-hospital CPR showed a strong trend toward increased mortality risk (OR 1.88, 95% CI 0.94–3.75; p = 0.07), whereas in-hospital CPR did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.63–2.34; p = 0.56).

Although there was also a clear trend of higher median CRP at postoperative day 3 in patients with AL (150 vs 91 mg/dL; p = 0.07), this difference did not reach statistical significance most likely due to a type 2 statistical error.

There was a marginal trend toward differences in Lactobacillus abundance in rectal feces between the following time points: FD3 vs FD21 ( P = 0.07), FD7 vs FD21 ( P = 0.07), and FD14 vs FD21 ( P = 0.10), although these differences did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

Finally, in Latinx/Hispanic individuals, the AAMR remained stable over the entire study period [AAPC + 1.7% (95%CI -2.0 to 5.5), p = 0.38), despite an increasing trend from 2012 to 2019 [APC: +8.7%, (95%CI: -0.9 to 19.2), p = 0.07) which did not reach statistical significance.

However, also CS-AML showed a trend toward an inferior CR rate as compared to de novo AML ( P =0.07), although this did not reach statistical significance, eventually due to the relative small number of patients in this group.

While the effect size suggests an important trend ( d =0.32), given the small sample size it did not reach statistical significance ( U =59.9, P =.07).

Lymph node metastasis showed a trend toward significance (β = 0.154, p = 0.070), although it did not reach statistical significance.

The primary diagnosis of neurological conditions showed a trend toward increased odds of moderate (OR: 16.27; 95% CI: 0.82–322.65; p = 0.07) and high stress (OR: 6.86; 95% CI: 0.14–343.83; p = 0.34) compared to cardiovascular admissions, but these associations did not reach statistical significance.

While the pooled analysis did not reach statistical significance, there was a slight trend towards reduced risk with GLP-1 RA use (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62–1.02; p = 0.07; I 2 = 65%) (Fig. 4 ).

This difference did not reach statistical significance; however, there was a statistical trend toward better effectiveness in the second cohort ( P = 0.07).

Male sex showed a trend toward incomplete occlusion (aOR 3.2; p = 0.07) that did not reach statistical significance. 19 ) The multicenter study: A practice-defining contribution The multicenter analysis redefines the evidence base for FDS after SAC in several important ways. 19 ) First, the 98.3% technical success rate across 22 institutions definitively answers the previously debated question of whether FDS deployment within a pre-existing SAC stent is reliably achievable: it is, when performed by experienced teams using contemporary delivery systems.

The findings indicated that vaginal administration was significantly associated with HPV lesion resolution (RR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.57–3.11, p < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%), whereas oral administration showed a positive trend that did not reach statistical significance (RR = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.96–2.38, p = 0.07; I 2 = 0%).

However, tyrosine, which is derived from phenylalanine, was not elevated; on the contrary, its concentration showed a decreasing trend that did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.07).

Under standard testing conditions, the association between the composite LLQ score and either LLVA or LLD was only borderline significant in the overall cohort ( P = 0.07), and did not reach statistical significance among subjects with AMD.

While this represented a numerical trend towards increased periprocedural risk with EIVOM, the RR did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.54; 95% CI 0.94–2.54; I 2 = 0%, P = 0.07) ( Figure 11A ).

S-1-based regimens showed a trend toward a higher ORR than capecitabine, with a pooled risk ratio of 1.14 (95% CI: 0.99-1.32; p = 0.07), though this difference did not reach statistical significance.

While age-related trends in survival did not reach statistical significance, all patients over 70 experienced a complication, and mortality in this age group was higher, approaching significance at 60 days (P=0.07), and significant at 90 days (P=0.01).

However, because of the sample size of 84 patients (22 with toxicity versus 62 without toxicity), the results did not reach statistical significance but were marginally significant ( P = 0.071 for LZD and P = 0.079 for PNU142586), indicating the need for a larger clinical study to clarify these findings.

The Q2 group did not show significant differences from the Q1 group in any of the models, while the Q4 group displayed a near-significant trend in the fully adjusted model (β = 0.021, 95% CI: −0.002 to 0.045, P = .071), though this did not reach statistical significance.

Although the difference in the mean SCE levels between the patient and first-degree relative group did not reach statistical significance, the borderline significance ( p =0.071) in this case may indicate a high level of chromosomal instability in breast cancer families.