Barely Significant

Excerpts

8,476 sentences · 1 filter applied

a clear trendp = 0.0601.2× alphagold
Additionally, a clear trend of increased AUC ∞ /DW (613.46 ± 220.42 h*ng*kg/mL*mg, p = 0.060) and C max /DW (57.69 ± 22.19 ng*kg/mL*mg, p = 0.067) was also observed for SLCO1B1 DFs + PFs in comparison to IFs + NFs (530.36 ± 223.98 h*ng*kg/mL*mg for AUC ∞ /DW; and 49.59 ± 22.09 ng*kg/mL*mg for C max /DW) ( Table 3 ).
showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
CIRBP and CIRBP-SV1 expression were downregulated compared to the control siRNA (67.8% decrease, p = 0.015; 85.2% decrease, p < 0.001, respectively), and CIRBP-SV3 showed a trend towards decreased expression (43.4%; p = 0.06) ( Figure 7 C).
borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Examination of the model investigating the statistical interaction between STAT1 and TGFB2 showed that there was a borderline significant increase in HR for the TGFB2 high group of patients (HR (95% CI range) = 1.84 (0.97–3.46); p = 0.06) There was a significant increase in HR for the STAT1 high group of patients (HR (95% CI range) = 2 (1.08–3.71); p = 0.029), accounting for significant impact of age at diagnosis (HR (95% CI range) = 1.03 (1.01–1.05); p = 0.005).
a statistical trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In our experience, despite a statistical trend ( p = 0.06) in inducing IL6 protein expression in HTR-8/SVneo cells, a low-dose tacrolimus of 10 ng/mL was not sufficient to significantly induce the expression of this pleotropic cytokine in these EVT cells when cultured under nitrosative stresses in vitro ( Supplementary Figure S2 ).
a strong trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
That way, the intermediate- ( p < 0.0001) and high-stress ( p < 0.01) regimes both showed a significant relative reduction in the IVDs’ height (intermediate-stress: 26.1 ± 4.3% reduction and high-stress: 20.9 ± 1.7% reduction, respectively), and a strong trend was observed with the low-stress regime ( p = 0.06) ( Figure 1 b).
a clear trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Dunnett’s post hoc testing after ANOVA revealed a significant preventive effect for ectoine and a clear trend for NADA ( p = 0.06). 5-Hydroxyectoine had considerably smaller effects that did not prove to be statistically significant, probably due to the sample size of n = 10. 3.