Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,163 sentences · 1 filter applied

nominally significantP < 0.051.0× alphagold
Nominally significant effects of diagnosis on AIs (i.e., with P < 0.05, but which did not survive multiple comparison correction), were observed for the fusiform surface area AI ( β = −0.005, t = −2.56, P = 0.010) (Supplementary Table 2 ), pars orbitalis thickness AI ( β = −0.003, t = −2.26, P = 0.024), posterior cingulate thickness AI ( β = −0.003, t = −2.1, P = 0.034), superior temporal thickness ( β = −0.002, t = −1.97, P = 0.049), and caudate nucleus volume ( β = 0.003, t = 2.24, P = 0.025).
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Among these 38 genes, 13 replicated at a Bonferroni significance level (Logistic Regression p < 0.0013) with directions of effect consistent with the discovery findings in a cohort of unrelated, non-Hispanic white Kaiser Permanente health plan members (6653 PrCa cases, 30,121 controls), and an additional six were nominally significant ( p < 0.05; Table 1 ).
approached significanceP -value < 0.051.0× alpha
While none passed multiple testing correction, mainly because of a lack of power since we have a limited sample size in an analysis with thousands of parameters (clones), we could observe that the few clones that approached significance ( P -value < 0.05) were shared across patients only in PR group and enriched at 24 months post transplant.
T/F viruses with incompletely closed Envs were also more sensitive to sCD4, although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 3d ); and we observed a significant correlation between cold and sCD4 sensitivity ( P = 0.0005; Fig. 1f ).
nominally significantP < 0.051.0× alphagold
We considered a SNP-lipid association to be validated if (i) the SNP was significantly associated ( P < 5 × 10 −8 ) in the unadjusted BHS discovery GWAS; (ii) the direction of effect was concordant between the validation meta-analysis and the BHS discovery analysis; and (iii) the association was nominally significant ( P < 0.05; less conservative) or reached the Bonferroni significance threshold ( P < 2.34 × 10 −5 ) in the validation meta-analysis.
nominally significantP < 0.051.0× alphagold
We provided detailed RegulomeDB annotations in relevant cell types (e.g., hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cells, CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells, any primary B-cell, lymphoblastoid cell lines from 1000 Genomes [i.e., GM19238], K562, NAMALWA, BLaER1) for: (a) all index variants; and (b) credible set variants with nominally significant ( P < 0.05) functional probability scores.