Secondly, while analysis of the Flt3-ITD negative patients included in the analysis of Verhaak et al [ 36 ] showed a strong trend for decreased survival of DNMT3B high-expressing AML patients (p = 0.05 each for event-free and overall survival), this was not the case for FLT3-ITD positive patients (not shown).
Excerpts
Hyperglycemia was associated with an increase in the following parameters: Vmax (p<0.001), S'max (p<0.001), strain rate, (p = 0.02) and strain (near-significant: p = 0.05).
Rapamycin-feeding resulted in a marginally significant increase in total sleep time (Treatment effect, p = 0.05) when the sexes were combined, but not when each sex was treated separately (females: Treatment effect, p = 0.10, males: Treatment effect, p = 0.26).
Several genera, including Clostridium, Ruthenibacterium, and Dorea, showed nominally significant associations (p < 0.05).
All these factors were significantly associated with susceptibility to WTS except for perceived harm of WTS relative to cigarettes, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).
The differences in sucrose contents between WT, pBI and AtbZIP53-ox lines were highly significant as calculated by Students t -test (* P <0.05; ** P <0.01).
Separate analyses of variance in general linear models revealed significant dependence of the yield on the individual tree (replicated in 2 harvests; P<0.001, harvest-related changes were marginally significant at P<0.05), the individual genotype group (trees representing replicates; P<0.01) and the individual farm (with a farm’s trees as replicates; P<0.001).
typhimurium - induced wound damage than the long-term alcoholic cells (EtOH) but appeared to be less resistant than the control group, although the differences between the recovery and the control groups did not reach statistical significance ( Figs. 5C and 5D and Movie S9 , p <0.05 between EtOH and Recovery groups vs. control).
However, the effects reported in Bäumler’s study [ 3 ] were small and nominally significant (two-tailed p < .05) only for bulkiness.
In the case of PIK3CA, mutations and gene amplification were apparently mutually exclusive, though, due to the limitedness of the sample under analysis, this correlation did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.05).
Interestingly, a trend was also seen for controls, but this did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.050).
A highly significant ( p < 0.05) negative correlation was observed between average body weight gain and FCR at 21−28 days (R 2 = −0.926), 29−35 days (R 2 = −0.958), and 21–35 days (R 2 = −0.962), indicating that greater weight gain was consistently associated with improved feed efficiency under prolonged supplementation.
approached significancep <.05
The group×target valence×congruency interaction also approached significance [ F (1,38) = 4.72, p <.05], but no interaction between any two factors approached significance (all p s>.05).
There was a trend towards increased FN at 12 hrs (p<0.06), but this did not reach statistical significance. *, p<0.05.
At a group level, there was a marginally significant difference between the mean horizontal positions for left vs right cues ( t = 2.15, p < 0.05), but the overall evidence was not compelling ( l o g 10 B F 10 = 0.19).
DJF003 was another marker has weakly significant ( P = 0.05) associated with SCMV-BJ and SCMV-Seehausen, closest linked to the abovementioned hypothetical protein.
The results were highly significant in ACEA and ACNB treated groups (P < 0.05) at 1000 mg/kg, when compared with the diseased control group.
When β > 0 and p < 0.01, it indicates a highly significant delay (extension); when 0.01 < p < 0.05, it indicates a significant delay (extension); and when 0.05 < p < 0.1, it indicates an insignificant delay (extension).
The difference in early-life fecundity was marginally significant ( F 1,37 = 3.98; p = 0.05).
There was a similar pattern of effect when cells were immunostained with Ab109115 , although this was only mildly significant in the N/P ratio for Hdh Q7/7 cells (p<0.05; S6 Fig ).
With Leuppi 2013 included, the mean difference is marginally significant at -0.91 days (95% CI = -1.81–-0.02 days, p = 0.05).
did not quite reach significancep = 0.05
The effect for subscale 4 was similar, though this test did not quite reach significance ( F (1, 292) = 3.88, p = 0.05).
The group difference, however, was only marginally significant, t (198) = 1.97, p = .050, d = 0.28.
marginally non-significantp-value = 0.050
Although marginally non-significant (p-value = 0.050, df = 4), the G-test results showed a tendency for gomphid larvae to display a natural post-mortem position, with the hind legs extended laterally and the forelegs extended close to the body.
of borderline significancep = 0.050
Among CM CD4+ T cells, the relationship between MDA and P-STAT5 was of borderline significance (p = 0.050) when controlling for plasma HIV RNA copy numbers.