Excerpts

In contrast, I bs was only a relatively weak and marginally significant (Beta = 0.180, p = 0.06) predictor of female obesity prevalence ( Table 5 ).

Overall, the use of IMRT was associated with a 24% relative reduction (HR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.57–1.01) in the risk of loco-regional relapse compared to 2D/3D-RT ( Fig 4 ), which was statistically of borderline significance (p = 0.06) as the upper bound of the 95%CI was just touching the line of unity.

For the sagittal TDE maps, the only association noted was a positive trend for DSC(Delayed Sagittal , TDE Sagittal ) with T2 signal (F 1 = 4.1, R 2 = 0.20, p = 0.06).

A weakly significant species (within competition)× 15 N solution interaction for 15 N molar excess in shoot biomass ( F 2,34 = 3.0, P = 0.06) provided evidence that our plant species displayed different N uptake preferences, and that plant species preferences were modified by inter-specific competition.

We have likewise shown that LVSWI is superior to SVI, although this difference is of marginal significance (p = 0.06).

A generalized mixed effects regression analysis with number of self-referent word stimuli recalled as the negative binomial outcome variable and drift rate and stimuli valence as independent variables found a marginally significant interaction, β = −0.10, 95% CI [-0.21, 0.004], z = −1.89, p = .06.

Please remark how the continuous NRI achieved near significance (0.085; P = 0.06), providing further evidence of the value of OPN when estimating risk for the composite event.

The effect of CPF on body weight just missed significance on day 21 [F (1,23) = 27.204, p = 0.06], while at adulthood (70 days) this trend was no longer evident [F (1,18) = 12.853, p = 0.16].

An interaction term approached significance ( P = 0.06) in the full model, but the corresponding main effect of treatment was noticeably not associated in this modeling scenario ( P = 0.16).

In addition, Bhlhe41 mRNA levels trended towards an increase that was not quite significant (15% upregulated p = 0.06) ( Fig 6 ).

Notably, scores for this subgroup were higher overall in the HOT compared to the CONTROL trial (main effect for trial approaching significance; p = 0.06), with moderate to large ES found between trials at baseline, 60, 90 and 120 min ( d = 0.83 [-0.17, 1.75] to 1.81 [0.64, 2.81]).

Between-arm differences in sexual satisfaction changes were statistically significant (p = 0.027), while differences in erectile function changes were borderline non-significant (p = 0.060).

In cohort-2, DFS and BCSS was borderline significant (DFS: log rank = 0.06, BCSS: log rank p = 0.06; S3 Fig ), while in TCGA there was no association ( S3 Fig ).

Subgroup 3 (subjects exposed to FQ for 91–180 days before the index date) showed modest significance in adjusted odds ratio (1.42, P = 0.06, 95% CI 0.99–2.05).

In the 600–900 ms time window, there was a near-significant main effect of condition F (2, 18) = 3.28, MSE = 6.38, p = .06 at midline sites, F (2, 18) = 3.33, MSE = 15.56, p = .06 at lateral sites, but a significant interaction between condition and anteriority, F (6, 54) = 3.29, MSE = 0.47, p < .01 at midline sites, F (12, 108) = 2.46, MSE = 0.73, p < .01 at lateral sites.

Whilst no level of the modality attribute reached the 5% level of statistical significance, telephone-based provision was negative and of borderline significance (p = 0.06).

Age showed a trend to an independent prognostic factor as well (p = 0.06): Fig 4 .

Finally, results of Model 8 revealed marginally significant effects of cocaine misuse diagnosis on the intercept ( p = .060) and slope ( p = .051), which were positive and negative, respectively.

Myc overexpression showed a trend towards significant correlation with OIII grade and presence of MVP in univariate analysis (p = 0.06 for both data).

After adjusting by age, route of HIV infection, length of infection before cART and viral hepatitis coinfection, CCR2 rs1799864-AG genotype was significantly associated with INR status (OR [95% CI]: 1.80 [1.04–3.11]; p = 0.04), and CXCL12 rs1801157-TT genotype showed a trend (OR [95% CI]: 2.47 [0.96–6.35]; p = 0.06).

When the consistent group is considered, performance continued to increase between phase 2 and 3, though this effect only approached significance (β = −10.6, SE = 5.46, t = −1.94, p = 0.06).

sH1N1 FluoroSpot revealed no significant changes in IFNγ SFCs after either dose of vaccine ( Fig 3C ), but exhibited a marginally significant increase in GrB SFCs post-dose 1 (p = 0.06; Fig 3D ).

Although quite less than these studies, our model predicted only 10.7% of total intention, including the BFSN, showed the likely trait (marginally significant; p = .060; Table 3 ), so we included it in the model with further adjustment, and it was significant (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.01–2.71; Table 4 ).

Pronoun type shows an effect on the EDA measure meaning that stories with 3 rd person pronouns showed a higher number of peaks in the EDA signal compared to 1 st person pronoun stories, a difference which almost reached statistical significance (β = 1.04, s.e. = 0.55, t = 1.89, p = 0.06, see S1 Statistical Models modeld2slopes , Fig 4 ).

Overall, the correlation was not quite significant (Spearmann’s rho = −0.33, p = 0.06), though the correlation for warm stimulation was significant (rho = −0.655, p = 0.034).