Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

almost significantp = .061.2× alphagold
Simple interaction-contrasts revealed a significant difference between the correct answers given by soccer-players and non-athletes for the body postures stimuli compared to the cube figure stimuli, F (1,38) = 4.75, p <.05, η 2 = .11 and an almost significant difference between both groups on reaction time on the human figures compared to cube figures, F (1,38) = 3.76, p = .06, η 2 = .09 (see table 1 ).
a negative trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Moderating effects of intervention duration, age and gender Meta-regression analyses revealed a negative trend between intervention duration and effect sizes for teacher-rated disruptive behavior ( b(SE) = 0.006(0.003), p = 0.06, R 2 = .22), suggesting larger effects for behavioral programs with a shorter duration.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.061.2× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
Assessment of hepatic triglyceride levels confirmed that HFD-fed mice had significantly higher liver triglycerides compared to Chow-fed mice ( Fig 4B ) (p < 0.01) but HCD-fed mice only showed a trend towards higher liver triglyceride content, which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06).
only marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
We also found support for the hypothesis ( Hypothesis 4 ) that workers’ need for structure at work negatively predicts their perceived effectiveness of blended working (see Table 3 ), although in the regression analyses (see Table 4 ), the link between need for structure and the perceived effectiveness of location-independent working was only marginally significant ( p = .06).
Blended working: for whom it may (not) work.
PLoS One · 2014 · PMC4102582
a trend toward significancep = 0.0601.2× alpha
The standardized coefficient of the pendency (β) of the linear model showed a trend toward significance [β = −0.612, t(1,8) = −2.187 p = 0.060] for the drug group in APM scores of the low difficulty level ( Figure 2 , diamonds). β was statistically significant for the placebo group (β = −0.598, t(1,11) = −2.472 p = 0.031] when studied for the same APM category (low difficulty; Figure 2 , diamonds).
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Parent specific effects were not found in our sample, a GLM including parent (father/mother) as additional factor did not show a significant effect for parent , ( F (1,45) = 0.099, p = 0.75), while the main effect group and the interaction effect group × parenting style remained unchanged; the marginally significant main effect parenting style was not significant anymore, p = 0.06, due to model complexity.
borderline significanceP = 0.061.2× alpha
Nonetheless, this continuous development of DRMs in patients starting ART since 2007 sets NNRTI apart from the other historical drug classes, where there is a decreasing trend; PI resistance for group IV in 2011 was significantly lower than expected (P = 0.04, chi-square test), and the same trend was seen for NRTI, although with borderline significance (P = 0.06, chi-square test).
borderline significanceP = 0.061.2× alpha
Effects of condition on grams consumed In a repeated ANOVA measures analysis, there was a significant effect of condition (F(1.862) = 5.35, P = 0.01), food type (F(1) = 9.91, P = 0.006), and borderline significance in the interaction term (F(1.79) = 3.2, P = 0.06) in terms of total grams consumed.