Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Although the main effect of participant group was marginally significant ( F (1,12) = 4.05, p = 0.07), Newman-Keuls tests did not reveal significant differences between the control gains of the two participant groups for either the vertical ( p = 0.14) or the horizontal ( p = 0.13) target motion conditions.
approached significancep = .071.4× alpha
Again, the RT results (see Table 1 ) followed this pattern, as shown by the significant main effects (Distractor presence: F (1, 9) = 20.13, p<.01; SOA: F (1.82, 16.37) = 18.86, p<.001), and the interaction effect that now approached significance (F (4, 36) = 2.38, p = .07).
marginally significantp = .071.4× alphagold
We observed no main effect of expectedness status, F(1, 20) = 2.80, p = .11, η 2 = .12, no main effect of semantic category, F(1, 20) = 1.93, p = .18, η 2 = .09, and a marginally significant expectedness status by semantic category interaction, F(1, 20) = 3.70, p = .07, η 2 = .16; this interaction was characterized by longer reaction times for standard emotional words (mean = 1274, SE = 48) relative to same-list unexpected neutral words (mean = 1185 SE = 40, p<01), or relative to standard neutral words (mean = 1194, SE = 48, p<.01) and same-list unexpected emotional words (mean = 1185 SE = 47, p<.05).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
For ∂ 15 N and sex, maturity stage and location a marginally significant relationship was found (∂ 15 N: p = 0.07, r 2 = 0.31, F 10,43 = 1.92) attributed to the fact that male individuals of S . pteropus do not grow as large as females and therefore occupy lower size classes with lower ∂ 15 N values ( Fig 5A ).
marginally significantp = .071.4× alphagold
Notably, a marginally significant effect of self-defining gender with Self—Gender Identity Match emerged (B = -0.013, SE = 0.009, t (8781) = 1.44, p = .07), indicating that stronger self-definingness of gender is associated with faster responses to traits overlapping with the self and the female identity (in comparison to a Self-Identities Mismatch).
only marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
It is worth noting, however, that using a slightly altered model–which treats APOE as a nominal or categorical ( carrier / non - carrier ) variable–in order to re-analyze a sub-set of this data which excludes these two ε2 subjects: 1) does not significantly alter the ε4 effects seen, and 2) still generates results suggestive of a protective morphometric main effect of a single ε2 allele (an effect size of +505.84 mm 3 , equivalent to a nearly 13% increase in hippocampal volume; Cohen’s d = 0.14, effect size r = 0.68)–though, this result is only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) (see Table 8 for a full summary of the results for this modified model).
At the age of 21 days we did not detect statistical differences in testosterone levels between MUN and control males or between MUN and control females, although there was a tendency towards higher levels in MUN males ( Fig 9 ) and the interaction between sex and fetal nutrition was near statistical significance (p = 0.07, Table 2 ).