Two additional targets slightly missed significance at α<0.05, SBSN (p<0.07) and NY-ESO-1 (p<0.09) (2 tailed Student's t-test assuming unequal variance).
Excerpts
Although the main effect of participant group was marginally significant ( F (1,12) = 4.05, p = 0.07), Newman-Keuls tests did not reveal significant differences between the control gains of the two participant groups for either the vertical ( p = 0.14) or the horizontal ( p = 0.13) target motion conditions.
approached significancep = 0.07
The relationship between deafness and coat speckling approached significance (p = 0.07), with the lack of statistical significance possibly due to only four families co-segregating for both deafness and speckling.
Novel-miR37 and miR-68 approached but did not reach significance ( p = 0.07 and 0.08, respectively) ( Fig. 5 and Supporting Information S1, Table S19 ).
approached significancep = .07
Again, the RT results (see Table 1 ) followed this pattern, as shown by the significant main effects (Distractor presence: F (1, 9) = 20.13, p<.01; SOA: F (1.82, 16.37) = 18.86, p<.001), and the interaction effect that now approached significance (F (4, 36) = 2.38, p = .07).
showed a trendP = 0.07
Circulating biomass was higher in children with LA and showed a trend toward increase in children with DB ( P = 0.07, Table 2 ).
approached significancep = .07
In addition, differences between females and males for sacrum Peak accel (4–13%) approached significance (p = .07).
Estradiol also showed a decreasing trend in GPER OD that was close to statistical significance (P = 0.07).
A significant main effect for sex was found for tibia Peak accel , tibia Rate accel , and sacrum Rate accel with trivial effect sizes, with sacrum Peak accel approaching significance (p = .07) ( Table 4 ).
approached significancep = 0.07
An interaction between rider group × lap × bend also approached significance (F(2,58) = 2.745; MSe = 7.823; p = 0.07).
We observed no main effect of expectedness status, F(1, 20) = 2.80, p = .11, η 2 = .12, no main effect of semantic category, F(1, 20) = 1.93, p = .18, η 2 = .09, and a marginally significant expectedness status by semantic category interaction, F(1, 20) = 3.70, p = .07, η 2 = .16; this interaction was characterized by longer reaction times for standard emotional words (mean = 1274, SE = 48) relative to same-list unexpected neutral words (mean = 1185 SE = 40, p<01), or relative to standard neutral words (mean = 1194, SE = 48, p<.01) and same-list unexpected emotional words (mean = 1185 SE = 47, p<.05).
a trend toward significancep = 0.07
In the AA cohort, there were no significant associations between the three EGR3 or the single ARC SNP tested, though the ARC SNP rs1996147 showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.07).
For ∂ 15 N and sex, maturity stage and location a marginally significant relationship was found (∂ 15 N: p = 0.07, r 2 = 0.31, F 10,43 = 1.92) attributed to the fact that male individuals of S . pteropus do not grow as large as females and therefore occupy lower size classes with lower ∂ 15 N values ( Fig 5A ).
approached significanceP = 0.07
Results At weaning, hypothalamic FTO mRNA expression was increased significantly in offspring of obese mothers and FTO was correlated with both visceral and epididymal fat mass (P<0.05); body weight approached significance (P = 0.07).
The main effect of interval fell short of significance, F (1, 15) = 3.66, p >.07, as well as the Interval×Block interaction, F (2, 30) = 3.19, p >.07.
Notably, a marginally significant effect of self-defining gender with Self—Gender Identity Match emerged (B = -0.013, SE = 0.009, t (8781) = 1.44, p = .07), indicating that stronger self-definingness of gender is associated with faster responses to traits overlapping with the self and the female identity (in comparison to a Self-Identities Mismatch).
It is worth noting, however, that using a slightly altered model–which treats APOE as a nominal or categorical ( carrier / non - carrier ) variable–in order to re-analyze a sub-set of this data which excludes these two ε2 subjects: 1) does not significantly alter the ε4 effects seen, and 2) still generates results suggestive of a protective morphometric main effect of a single ε2 allele (an effect size of +505.84 mm 3 , equivalent to a nearly 13% increase in hippocampal volume; Cohen’s d = 0.14, effect size r = 0.68)–though, this result is only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) (see Table 8 for a full summary of the results for this modified model).
The only exception was Question 4 to which the primary cohort’s response to Question 4 which was approaching significance, Primary - Question 4: χ 2 (84)=3.18, p = 0.07 and the secondary cohort’s response was not significant, p = 0.18.
For both FAFV and Bacteroidetes, there was a clear trend towards a higher load in patients that underwent biliary drainage (6093.8 vs 2234.2 p = 0.070, 59.2 vs 27.6, p = 0.070 respectively), but it did not reach statistical significance ( Fig 2B ).
close to significancep < 0.07
The Modality factor was close to significance (F[ 1 , 20 ] = 3.81, p < 0.07).
trend toward significancep = 0.07
A similar trend toward significance was observed for this gene between the controls and all metabolic patients (i.e. the MetS and T2D patients) (p = 0.07).
In addition, the difference was marginally significant for pT ( p = 0.07), Dukes classification ( p = 0.10), and v ( p = 0.07).
In addition, a marginally significant difference between cultural idioms and novel metaphors was observed ( p = .07) showing that instructive expressions were the most demanding and difficult to process for the children.
near statistical significancep = 0.07
At the age of 21 days we did not detect statistical differences in testosterone levels between MUN and control males or between MUN and control females, although there was a tendency towards higher levels in MUN males ( Fig 9 ) and the interaction between sex and fetal nutrition was near statistical significance (p = 0.07, Table 2 ).
borderline significancep = 0.07
It was the largest univariate factor reducing entropy with a borderline significance at p = 0.07 (at χ 2 = 5.317).