Excerpts

The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated highly significant differences ( p < 0.05) among the accessions for all of these retained traits, indicating a substantial level of phenotypic variability within the studied germplasm.

CC), the combined frequency of heterozygous and homozygous mutant genotypes (CG + GG) was 48.39% in cases and 40.32% in controls, but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.05; OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.91).

The two groups of children had comparable performance in TOH ( p = 0.78), but for the number sense task the difference between groups of children approached significance ( p = 0.05).

The study found a clear dose-effect relationship, as the change in refractive error progressively increased with higher levels of PM 2.5 , CO, and O 3 , with exposure to the highest levels resulting in a considerably significant change ( p < 0.05).

TP53 was marginally significant (FDR > 0.33 and p < 0.05) in many other cancer types, while MUC4 was in a few others.

We also observed a ~74% reduction in the area of osteoid surface to bone surface (OS/BS) in unloaded mice treated with vehicle compared to control mice (p < 0.05), whereas in unloaded mice treated with r-Irisin a strong trend toward increased OS/BS was observed, albeit it was still lower than in control mice (p > 0.05).

7 ), and a highly significant positive correlation was observed between the degradation extent of n -hexadecane and the DHA activity (R = 0.587, p < 0.05, n = 16), even though part of the n -hexadecane was degraded by the electrokinetic treatment in Bio1-EK.

The adequacy of the models was assessed using an analysis of variance, which indicated that the regression models were highly significant ( P < 0.05).

Although the physical activity, measured in METs, was higher in the high GNRI group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P < 0.05) (Table 1 ).

In the East zone, five loci met the criteria for deviation from HWE, with four markers being highly significant ( P < 0.001) and CsM43755 being slightly significant ( P < 0.05), while the remaining five markers were monomorphic (Table 5 ).

The OR at NPAR ≥ 0.92 remains at the borderline significant level ( P = 0.050), but the overall analysis does not support the existence of a threshold effect.

In the univariate analysis, smaller FCD volumes showed a statistical trend of being correlated with higher AI values after controlling for age at MRI (Spearman’s correlation: − 0.48, p = 0.05, Fig. 2 B), whereas other epilepsy-related or lesion-related features were not related to AI values (Table 4 ).

Curvilinear velocity (VCL) and straight-line velocity (VSL) showed a decreasing trend commencing at 1 μM ( p < 0.05).

Also, the interaction between cathodal versus sham tDCS, verb type, and response effector approached significance (p = 0.050).

The differences between mean values were considered statistically significant and highly significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.

albopictus demonstrated less sensitivity to these factors, with only the quadratic effect of temperature approaching significance ( p = 0.05).

We checked statistical assumptions of nominally significant ( p < 0.05) linear regression models (Parts 2 and 6) by means of visual inspection of the following residual plots: correct specification of the model (residuals vs. fitted values), normality of residuals (normal Q–Q), homoscedasticity of residuals (scale location) and existence of outliers or influential data points (residuals vs. leverage).

The total amount of blood transfused during the first 48 hours had borderline significance (p = 0.05).

A two-way ANOVA with factors of treatment type and session found an interaction that approached significance, F (2, 33) = 3.78, p = 0.050, η 2 = 0.116.

Differentially methylation CpG sites The epigenome-wide differential methylation analysis revealed 26982 CpG sites that differed between obese and lean individuals with nominally significant p-values (p ≤ 0.05).

Furthermore, a comparison of the phylogenetic and functional genetic distances between test isolates showed a clearly significant (p < 0.05) relationship.

The sample of Caracas, Venezuela, presented a shifted allele frequency distribution but the corresponding heterozygosity test was only marginally significant ( p < 0.05).

While the main effect of synchrony was only marginally significant (F 1,352 = 3.9, p = 0.05), there was an interaction between synchrony and age group (F 1,352 = 7.7, p = 0.006).

The FG, TCHOL, TG, and HDL levels showed marginal significance in differences between clusters and in those with diabetes, which were reproducible in the discovery and validation cohorts ( P < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 1 ).

In non-diabetic participants (n = 8610), though the associations of the two GRSs with the four lipids were weakened, the results of causal association analyses were consistent with the analyses in the whole study sample, except for TC which was marginally significant in analysis with the Conservative GRS ( P = 0.05) (Supplemental Table 6 ).