Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP = 0.0090.2× alphaqualifiedgold
This was more highly significant over the final two treatment days ( P = 0.009), when post hoc testing showed the increase in tumor size in mice receiving combination therapy was significantly less than that in control mice ( P = 0.032), whereas there was no difference between control mice and those receiving either monotherapy.
highly significantP = 0.0090.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The maximum benefit in the CROSS-trial was observed in squamous cell carcinoma, with highly significant (HR = 0.48; 95%C.I. 0.28–0.83; P = 0.009) benefit compared with surgery alone, in comparison with adenocarcinoma, where the benefit was more modest (HR = 0.73; 95%C.I.0.55–0.98; P = 0.037), but the benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was consistent across subgroups, without any significant interaction identified [ 1 , 2 ].
highly significantp = 0.0090.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Resistance was more common among urinary than among fecal strains within each phylogenetic group, the difference being highly significant for groups B2 and D strains ( p = 0.009 and p = 0.003, respectively) and of borderline sig-nificance for groups B1 and A strains ( p = 0.05 for both).
highly significantp = 0.0090.2× alphaqualifiedgold
However, at six weeks, when allodynia has developed in the hind paw contralateral to the nerve injury ( Figure 1(e) ), ZIP produced transient, but highly significant increases in contralateral PWTs at 30 min ( F 1,10 = 10.627, p = 0.009) and 60 min ( F 1,10 = 12.438, p = 0.005), without effects on ipsilateral PWTs ( Figure 1(f) ).
marginally significantp = 0.0090.2× alphagold
Comparison Between T0 and T1 in the Group of Participants with Unilateral Brain Damage and in the Group of Healthy Controls Conducted in order to compare performance at T0 and T1 in the group of participants with unilateral brain damage, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a marginally significant improvement at T1 in the wFBET (Z = −2.37, p = 0.009, FDR-adj p = 0.051, one-tailed) and in the BI (Z = −2.12, p = 0.017, FDR-adj p = 0.051, one-tailed) when controlling the FDR at 0.05 using the Benjamini–Hochberg method.