Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Looking only at trials where the pre- and postsaccadic shapes were elongated (both aspect ratios greater than 1.2, corresponding to 21.21% of all Different trials included in the reaction time analysis), there was a marginally significant correlation between the Different preview log-transformed reaction times and the size of relative orientation differences ( r = 0.14, t (6) = 2.33 p = 0.06).
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
A generalized mixed effects regression analysis with number of self-referent word stimuli recalled as the negative binomial outcome variable and drift rate and stimuli valence as independent variables found a marginally significant interaction, β = −0.10, 95% CI [-0.21, 0.004], z = −1.89, p = .06.
A 200% increase was also observed for claudin-7, though not quite statistically significant (P = 0.06; the lack of statistical significance [P>0.05] was likely due to the relatively small sample size [n = 3 cell layers], and the strong effect that a small sample size has on Student t test results).
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
A two-way ANOVA for RTs showed that the main effect of neighborhood size was not significant in participant analysis [F 1 (1,105) = 0.65, p = .42], and marginally significant in item analysis [F 2 (1,96) = 3.54, p = .06]; the main effect of grade was significant in both participant and item analysis [F 1 (2,105) = 3.56, p <.05; F 2 (2,96) = 4.92, p <.01], post hoc analysis showed that the 3 rd graders responded significantly slower than the other two groups ( ps <.05), and there was no remarkable difference between the 5 th and 7 th graders ( p >.1); the two-way interaction was significant in participant analysis [F 1 (2,105) = 8.08, p <.01], but non-significant in item analysis [F 2 (2,96) = 0.45, p = .64].
approached significancep = .061.2× alpha
For fear arousal, results revealed a health warning label x exposure interaction that approached significance, F(1,55) = 3.76, p = .06, ɳ 2 ρ = .06, with post hoc analyses demonstrating that fear arousal increased in the control condition (p < .05) but remaining constant for the two remaining conditions (p > 0.4).
a trend toward significancep = .061.2× alpha
To evaluate the significant between group differences, we performed independent t-test comparisons and found a significant difference between the two groups for CTOA100 (HP:69.15%, LP:62.18%), t (51) = 2.26, p = .02, and a trend toward significance for the CTOA300 (HP: 49.88%, LP: 41.20%), t (51) = 1.90, p = .06, and CTOA500 (HP: 41.95%, LP: 33.04%), t (51) = 1.7, p = .09, conditions.
a strong trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Correlation between mRNA Levels of Cytokines and ET-1 in Alveolar Macrophages and Clinical and Hemodynamic Parameters in HF Patients When investigating the correlations between mRNA levels of ET-1 and the cytokines that were up-regulated in alveolar macrophages from HF patients (i.e., TNFα and IL-6) and clinical and hemodynamic parameters in these patients, we found a strong trend toward correlation between IL-6 mRNA levels and LV function [LV ejection fraction (EF); r = −0.53, p = 0.06].
a negative trendP = 0.061.2× alphagold
a positive trendP = 0.081.6× alphagold
Infant hypertonicity also showed a negative trend in its association with HSD11B2 methylation (ρ = −0.11, P = 0.06), while infant attention showed a positive trend in its association with HSD11B2 methylation, with increasing methylation related to increasing infant attention scores (ρ = 0.14, P = 0.08).
a strong trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Results Effect of Ethanol and Acetaldehyde on Trophoblast Invasion SGHPL-4 cells treated with ethanol exhibited no change in invasion through the matrigel-coated membrane barrier ( figure 1a ; p>0.05; N = 6), but it is noteworthy that at the highest concentration, there was a strong trend for reduced in invasion with 40 mM ethanol (p = 0.06; N = 6).
a possible trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Regression analysis computed for proportions of ΔS and β in BodyMap tissue RNA-Seq revealed a possible trend that did not reach significance (r 2 = 0.23, p = 0.06). ΔS/S ratios in tissues compared to other transcripts alternatively spliced at a GTAGTT donor splice site An intron’s donor splice site is initially recognized by complementary sequences in U1 and U6 small nuclear RNA (for a review see [ 24 ]).