Barely Significant
← all phrases

did not reach statistical significance

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 0 search hits before verification

In the literature

While SUV39H1 also showed a trend toward reduced survival in the high-expression cohort (HR = 2.36; p = 0.11), this did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 3 f), possibly due to the smaller cohort size or differential functional contribution between the two paralogs.
In patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), high TRPS1 expression was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.3, p = 0.037) and showed a trend toward poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.7, p = 0.11), although the latter did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 1 A).
a negative trendp = 0.1102.2× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.1102.2× alphaplainly factual
Although a negative trend was observed (β = −0.181), the association did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.110, R 2 = 0.047), suggesting that course length was not a major source of heterogeneity ( Figure 3D ).
Post-Exercise Plasma Glucose and Lactate Concentrations Neither TCTs nor WPIs significantly influenced post-exercise plasma glucose levels compared with the Control group ( Fig 5A ), although a slight trend for WPI (p = 0.11) and WPI + TCT (p = 0.06) to be higher than Control, this did not reach statistical significance.
Interestingly, we found only a positive trend of cytoplasmic ( p = 0.11, Kruskal–Wallis test) and membranous ( p = 0.13, Mann–Whitney U test) PSMA expression levels correlating with PSMA-PET positivity, which did not reach statistical significance.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.122.4× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp = 0.122.4× alpha
reported significantly elevated post-exercise noradrenaline levels in the BFR group compared to controls ( p < 0.05), while growth hormone showed a trend toward elevation that did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.12) [ 33 ].
The duration of motor block showed a trend towards being shorter in the reduced-dose fractionated group (Group B: 178 ± 43 min, Group F7: 169 ± 53 min, Group F6: 155 ± 33 min, p = 0.12), though this difference did not reach statistical significance.
a numerical trendp = 0.1252.5× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.1252.5× alphaplainly factual
In contrast, although there was a numerical trend toward fewer cases of septic shock in the S-UAS group, the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.11–1.31; p = 0.125; I 2 = 0%) (Fig. 7 ).