Excerpts

However, a * values and the reflectance percentage at 580 nm were approaching significance ( p = 0.078 and p = 0.080, respectively).

The only parameter that had an almost significant effect was pH ( p = 0.079), ( Equation (S10) in the Supplementary Materials ), as Gal readily degraded at very harsh conditions.

Similarly to yield, statistically significant differences in protein purity were only detected between protein extracts from non-defatted and combination-defatted ( p = 0.0019), SFE-defatted ( p = 0.018) protein extracts, and a marginally significant difference between non-defatted and oil press-defatted seed flour ( p = 0.079).

There was a nonsignificant trend ( p = 0.08, for all) of a treatment effect on total number of eggs per pen, total eggs per hen, and percentage egg production, with the highest vitamin K 3 treatment group (45.7 mg/kg diet) having modestly lower values (for example, 95% of that of the control group for each of the three parameters). 3.2.

As dietary energy levels increased, there was a decreasing trend in the concentration of C17:1 ( p = 0.08) and, conversely, an increasing trend in the concentration of C20:4n-6 ( p = 0.09).

Among PUFA, linoleic acid (C18:2 c9 c12) showed a trend towards a higher proportion in meat from Tara lambs as compared to Control lambs ( p = 0.08).

Despite these differences in sensory acceptance, purchase intention scores for the control and EOB samples showed only a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.081), with respective responses as follows: texture (24 vs. 39), flavor (37 vs. 35), acidity (22 vs. 17), and overall impression (17 vs. 9).

non-anthropomorphic conditions) on anticipatory guilt which revealed a significant difference between the pain trait condition and the non-anthropomorphic conditions ( t (270) = 3.788, p = 0.002), while the difference between the intelligence trait and the non-anthropomorphic conditions was only marginally significant ( t (270) = 1.748, p = 0.082) and the difference between the pro-social trait condition and the non-anthropomorphic conditions was non-significant ( t (270) = 1.572, p = 0.117).

Results showed a trend toward an interaction between injection treatment and cooking time ( p = 0.084) on metallic flavour development in cooked meat.

Although not all predictors were significant, there was a notable trend, with the solvent water/methanol showing a positive influence on FRAP levels (coefficient = 43.3467, p = 0.084), though this did not reach statistical significance. 4.

Effect of Mentally Simulating the Vice Food (Chocolate Cookies) Regarding the results for desire, “time” as the main effect was marginally significant (F(140) = 3.10, p = 0.086).

Main Effects Analyses The two-way MANCOVA shows a marginally significant total direct effect of ad type on taste perceptions ( F (1, 136) = 2.96, p = 0.088), with the single-sense ad slogan ( M = 7.15, SD = 1.60) leading to more positive taste perceptions than the multiple-sense ad slogan ( M = 6.68, SD = 1.61).

Interaction analysis revealed that BD (temperature × pectinase dosage) was significant ( F = 6.68, p = 0.0216), while BC (temperature × cellulase) approached significance ( F = 3.35, p = 0.0884), which was consistent with the response surface plots ( Figure 2 ).

The ESB group showed a trend ( p = 0.089) toward reduced CRP compared to the ESPB and CB groups at the endpoint.

Further analysis by grape variety revealed that Sauvignon B wines were the most accurately identified by taste as non-Chardonnay wines, with three out of five wines showing significant recognition ( p < 0.05) and one nearing significance ( p = 0.09).

The main effect of PROC had a significant impact on ES Water separation ( p < 0.001) and ES Fat separation ( p < 0.001), and it was approaching significance on batter pH ( p = 0.090).

Baseline comparisons of key demographic and clinical characteristics showed no significant differences in age or waist–hip ratio between the groups; however, the BMI differences approached significance ( p = 0.09).

Although the supplementation with rutin did not affect the concentration of individual n -6 PUFAs (including C18:2 ( n − 6), C18:3 ( n − 6), C20:2 ( n − 6), C20:3 ( n − 6), and C20:4 ( n − 6)), the R200 group showed an increasing trend in the sum of n -6 PUFAs in comparison to the other two groups ( p = 0.092).

Differences in GI values resulted in marginally significant differences between RU-DIMESA and COMM (difference 21.4; 95% C.I. −2~4.7; p -value = 0.092) and between RU-PONTE and ICS (difference 22.1; 95% C.I. −0.8~45.0; p -value = 0.092).

The test indicated a marginally significant trend favoring the nose (t = −1.75; p = 0.093), implying that olfaction provides better overall recognition of the wines.

The remaining direct effects of motion on appeal ( B = 0.09, SE = 0.09, t (153) = 1.03, p = 0.306, d = 0.163) and taste perception ( B = 0.03, SE = 0.11, t (153) = 0.25, p = 0.802, d = 0.04) were not significant, but there was a marginally significant remaining direct effect of motion on healthiness perception ( B = −0.13, SE = 0.08, t (153) = −1.68, p = 0.096, d = −0.266).

The INFO-SENS and INFO groups did not differ significantly under Dunn’s test (Δ = −0.803, p = 0.164), whereas the corresponding Welch-corrected comparison reached only marginal significance ( p = 0.097).

Next, a marginally significant interaction effect of picture type and context on product attitudes was revealed, F(1, 268) = 2.75, p = 0.098, η2 = 0.010.

The proportion of C 18:1 cis-11 showed an increasing trend in the SC20 and SC40 groups compared to the CON fed ewes ( p < 0.1).

However, the interaction term between location and product emerged as marginally significant and negative ( p < 0.10).