Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

barely significantp = .0290.6× alphagold
Nonetheless, we are cautious in making strong inferences from the total reading data because: i) the observed effect was numerically small in magnitude; ii) only two-thirds of the participants showed this advantage in total reading times; and iii) the effect did not reach the significance level in the item-analysis –note that the effect was barely significant (p = .029) when using a linear mixed model analysis for this comparison; and iv) the effect did not occur for total reading times or gaze durations at the local (word) level.
highly significantP = 0.02920.6× alphaqualifiedgold
However, in line with the results of Experiment 1, we observed a highly significant group difference for signals evoked by the syllable <ma1> in the post-hoc tests (RMS: post-hoc test /ma1/: F (1,25) = 5.35, P = 0.0292, η 2 = 0.15 t (25) = 2.31, P = 0.029; dipole analysis: group : F (1,25) = 4.86, P = 0.0369, η 2 = 0.16; hemisphere : F (1,25) = 5.30, P = 0.030, η 2 = 0.17; group*hemisphere : F (1,25) = 1.67, n.s.).
showed a trendP = 0.030.6× alpha
In a randomized controlled study (N = 7) that compared IAT to IVT with recombinant tPA for treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke with major vessel inclusion, Sen et al (2009) also found that IAT showed a trend toward a higher recanalization rate (3/3 patients for IAT and 0/4 patients for IVT; P = 0.03) ( Table 2 ) [ 20 ].
highly significantP = 0.030.6× alphaqualifiedgold
Evaluating the risk reduction by applying selenium and coenzyme Q10 to the middle selenium concentration group demonstrated a highly significant risk reduction (HR: 0.38; 95%CI 0.15–0.92; P = 0.03), even in competition with the same covariates as applied above ( Table 3 ).
approaching significancep = 0.030.6× alphagold
Similarly, sex was not found to have a significant indirect effect on EoL care preferences either in the Advanced Dementia scenario (β = -.16, p = 0.058) or in the Physical Disability scenario (β = -0.10, p = 0.06), despite approaching significance. ‘Willingness to be dependent’ was found to have a significant indirect effect on EoL care preferences in the Advanced Dementia scenario (β = 0.13, p = 0.03).
near-significantp = .030.6× alphagold
Using this classification, we again found significant or near-significant effects of expectation on delayed memory performance (VMT Completion Time: F 1,71 = 3.92, p = .03, η 2 p = 0.10; VMT Distance Traveled: F 1,71 = 4.31, p = .02, η 2 p = 0.11; VMT Backtracking: F 1,71 = 2.33, p = .11, η 2 p = 0.06; MST correct sequences: F 1,89 = 2.78, p = .07, η 2 p = 0.06).
marginally significantp=0.030.6× alphagold
Only the African sample showed marginally significant F ST higher than zero (0.08, p=0.03, not significant after Bonferroni correction), while other populations all had slightly negative estimates pointing to the limited role of the TYR locus in genetic differentiation within studied (sub-) continental groups ( Table S5 ) [ 74 ].
barely significantp = .030.6× alphagold
Of the three alleles tested, only 4a7a, a putative regulatory mutant, males showed a barely significant difference (p = .03) from non-mutant control flies ( CyO balancer) of the same cross indicating that the dominant enhancement (silencing) is dependent upon chromosomal location and not on the w + transgene Pci construct itself ( Figure 4 ).
marginally significantp<.030.6× alphagold
Planned comparisons further showed that monosyllables with large rises in sonority (e.g., blif ) produced reliably more accurate responses relative to small rises (e.g., bnif , t1(39) = 8.68, p<.0001; t2(45) = 3.25, p<.003), which, in turn produced reliably more accurate responses compared to sonority plateaus (e.g., bdif , t1(39) = 7.14, p<.0001; t2(45) = 5.27, p<.0001); the contrast between sonority plateaus and falls (e.g., lbif ) was marginally significant (t1(39) = 2.37, p<.03; t2(45) = 1.13, p<.28) To demonstrate that the effect of syllable type is not due to artifact associated with binary data [31] , we also submitted the results to a General Mixed Effects Model logistic regression model with syllable (monosyllables vs. disyllables) and type (e.g., blif, bnif, bdif, lbif ) as fixed effects, and participants and items as random effects.
Language universals engage Broca's area.
PLoS One · 2014 · PMC3990587