Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp<.030.6× alphagold
Planned comparisons further showed that monosyllables with large rises in sonority (e.g., blif ) produced reliably more accurate responses relative to small rises (e.g., bnif , t1(39) = 8.68, p<.0001; t2(45) = 3.25, p<.003), which, in turn produced reliably more accurate responses compared to sonority plateaus (e.g., bdif , t1(39) = 7.14, p<.0001; t2(45) = 5.27, p<.0001); the contrast between sonority plateaus and falls (e.g., lbif ) was marginally significant (t1(39) = 2.37, p<.03; t2(45) = 1.13, p<.28) To demonstrate that the effect of syllable type is not due to artifact associated with binary data [31] , we also submitted the results to a General Mixed Effects Model logistic regression model with syllable (monosyllables vs. disyllables) and type (e.g., blif, bnif, bdif, lbif ) as fixed effects, and participants and items as random effects.
Language universals engage Broca's area.
PLoS One · 2014 · PMC3990587
marginally significantp = 0.030.6× alphagold
This success rate was mainly influenced by the shoal size (p<0.0001) rather than by the number of residence events (p>0.05) that has only a marginally significant effect when coupled with the shoal size (p = 0.03) as shown by the model Succes ∼ shoal size + CRE + shoal size * CRE (Null deviance = 2152.38 with 51 df, Residual deviance = 261.22 with 48 df).
showed a trendP = 0.030.6× alpha
In a randomized controlled study (N = 7) that compared IAT to IVT with recombinant tPA for treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke with major vessel inclusion, Sen et al (2009) also found that IAT showed a trend toward a higher recanalization rate (3/3 patients for IAT and 0/4 patients for IVT; P = 0.03) ( Table 2 ) [ 20 ].
highly significantP = 0.030.6× alphaqualifiedgold
Evaluating the risk reduction by applying selenium and coenzyme Q10 to the middle selenium concentration group demonstrated a highly significant risk reduction (HR: 0.38; 95%CI 0.15–0.92; P = 0.03), even in competition with the same covariates as applied above ( Table 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.030.6× alphaqualifiedgold
“This discrepancy may be attributed to breed differences.” – So we end up dealing with different breeds or local populations that are not breeds? “There were highly significant differences (p < 0.03) in earlobe color among the chickens in the agroecologies for both males and females” – What statistical tests were used?
approaching significancep = 0.030.6× alphagold
Similarly, sex was not found to have a significant indirect effect on EoL care preferences either in the Advanced Dementia scenario (β = -.16, p = 0.058) or in the Physical Disability scenario (β = -0.10, p = 0.06), despite approaching significance. ‘Willingness to be dependent’ was found to have a significant indirect effect on EoL care preferences in the Advanced Dementia scenario (β = 0.13, p = 0.03).
slightly significantp = 0 . 030.6× alphaqualifiedgold
We observed a slightly significant difference in CH 4 emissions between the induced-to-drought and permanently flooded cores during the dry period ( t-Ratio = 2 . 3 , p = 0 . 03 ), caused by the high fluxes registered in the first days after the sediment was completely dry ( Fig 1 ).