Excerpts

There was a marginally significant effect of trial type on the intercept: b = -0.16, χ 2 (1) = 3.4, p < .07.

A strong trend in the same direction [t(19) = 1.92, p = 0.07, t-test] was also evident for P14-28 DZP-treated mice, representing a slightly delayed but temporally overlapping treatment window ( Figure 4c ).

Post-hoc comparisons achieved an almost significant effect (p = 0.07) of the drug in the time spent by animals in exploring the light compartment, when compared to vehicle administered animals.

A marginally significant main effect of intentionality, F (1, 62) = 3.37, p = .07, reflected longer response times to foreseen harm scenarios ( M = 6836 milliseconds, SD = 2246) than intentional harm scenarios ( M = 6540 milliseconds, SD = 2612).

In the EU group EGR3 SNP rs1877670 showed a trend toward association (p = 0.07), and the ARC SNP rs35900184 revealed a significant association with the schizophrenia diagnosis (p = 0.02).

In the AA cohort, there were no significant associations between the three EGR3 or the single ARC SNP tested, though the ARC SNP rs1996147 showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.07).

Group differences in the accuracy of alerting approached significance ( t (14) = 1.97, p = 0.07), while orienting ( t (14) = 0.62, p = 0.55) and executive control ( t (14) = 0.10, p = 0.92) did not differ statistically (see Table 2 ).

The main effect of group approached significance, F(1, 46) = 3.46, p = .07, η P 2 = .07 (words recalled: CM group = 6.00, Control group = 7.04, and there was a main effect of retention interval, F(1, 46) = 67.26, p<.0001, η P 2 = .60 (immediate recall = 7.44 words, delayed recall = 5.60 words), but group did not interact with retention interval (p = .71) (see Figure 2 ).

The correlation between tarsus and tail only approached significance (p = 0.07).

In particular, the main effect of the group still approached significance ( p = .07), the main effect of the distractor was not significant ( p = .26) and the crucial interaction was strongly significant ( p = .001).

As it is shown in Figure 1 , apoptosis markers were significantly increased in serum samples from both pediatric and adult patients with CHC compared to healthy subjects, except for sFas levels in CHC pediatric patient samples which only showed a trend of association (p = 0.07).

It is worth noting, however, that using a slightly altered model–which treats APOE as a nominal or categorical ( carrier / non - carrier ) variable–in order to re-analyze a sub-set of this data which excludes these two ε2 subjects: 1) does not significantly alter the ε4 effects seen, and 2) still generates results suggestive of a protective morphometric main effect of a single ε2 allele (an effect size of +505.84 mm 3 , equivalent to a nearly 13% increase in hippocampal volume; Cohen’s d = 0.14, effect size r = 0.68)–though, this result is only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) (see Table 8 for a full summary of the results for this modified model).

The association between HPV 16 lineage A and staging reached borderline significance (p = 0.07).

We found that a high dose (1 mg/kg body wt) of TSA was of borderline significance (t-test, p = 0.07) in inhibiting tumor growth in A549 tumor-bearing nude mice, whereas a low dose (0.5 mg/kg body wt) of TSA and quercetin alone had no effect (t-test, p> 0.05).

MAF of rs1061376 showed a trend towards a lower frequency in hypertensive patients [0.3 vs. 0.34; OR (T) = 0.83 (95%CI: 0.66 to 1.02; p = 0.07)].

For both FAFV and Bacteroidetes, there was a clear trend towards a higher load in patients that underwent biliary drainage (6093.8 vs 2234.2 p = 0.070, 59.2 vs 27.6, p = 0.070 respectively), but it did not reach statistical significance ( Fig 2B ).

Post-hoc paired-samples t -tests for each age group indicated that there was a significant difference in local efficiency from rest to 2-back for young participants, t (13) = 4.22, p = .001, Cohen’s d = 1.13, and a marginally significant difference for older participants, t (14) = 1.96, p = .070, Cohen’s d = 0.51.

3.2 Laboratory experimental study: Mate choice In general, males had to increase the use of refuges at high temperatures (Tukey 34°C vs 38°C, P = 0.01; Table 4 , Fig 4 ), although with a high inter-individual variability (Male refuge use variance: 34°C = 11269, 36°C = 78654, 38°C = 107728), whereas females showed the same tendency but with only marginal significance (Tukey 34°C vs 38°C P = 0.07).

For the comparison of response conflict (RI-SI), the difference was marginally significant among the four blocks, F (3,150) = 2.11, p = .07.

However, the effect of socioeconomic status on receiving anti-diabetic medication only approached significance (p = 0.07), and we found no significant association between socioeconomic status and control of diabetes.

We removed non-significant effects in a stepwise procedure, arriving at final model that included nearly significant effects of SC trial type (F 1,30 = 3.5, P = 0.07) and SC allopatric male display rate (F 1, 30 = 2.9, P = 0.10) and a significant effect of SC sympatric male display rate (F 1, 30 = 5.4, P = 0.03).

CRLB of metabolites that were significantly different or showed a trend between the two groups are marked with *p<0.07, **p<0.001.

The interaction cueing x group was also significant, F (3, 187) = 3.40, p = .02, η 2 = .05 and the interaction position x group approached significance, F (3, 187) = 2.41, p = .07, η 2 = .04.

Veterans decreased in perceived structure from the military to their first civilian job ( p = 0.03) whereas civilian students non-significantly increased in their perceived structure from their education to their first post-graduation job ( p = 0.29), resulting in a marginally significant veteran status by context interaction, F (1, 178) = 3.27, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.01 (see Study 1 Supplemental Analysis in supplemental materials for full results).

A similar pattern was observed for the percentage open arm entries with significant effects of Age (F(1,85) = 11.20,P<0.01) and Sex (F(1,85) = 3.97, P<0.05) as well as a strong trend for prenatal treatment (F(1,85) = 3.18, P = 0.07) as shown in Figure 1b .