Excerpts

There was also a marginally significant emotion × laterality × group interaction effect on the occipital LPP2 amplitudes [ F (2,72) = 3.08, p = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.08].

A two-way mixed-design ANOVA revealed a marginally significant interaction between the type of article (Martian life vs. synthetic life) and affect (positive vs. negative), F (1,503) = 3.73, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.007, such that reactions of those in the Martian life condition showed a stronger positivity bias than reactions of those in the synthetic life condition.

There was no interaction with age group for the difference between time bin 1 and time bin 2 for fixations on the alternative image ( ED = −0.01, z = −0.70, p > 0.05), but there was a marginally significant interaction for fixations on the target image ( ED = −0.04, z = −1.92, p = 0.05).

(2) The degree of political involvement in social networking is negatively related to PWB (H2 does not hold); its effect value was 0.21 ( t = 1.91, p < 0.05), i.e., the more often people participate in political discussions and share relevant information in social networking platforms, the less positive feeling about their life, socialization, and satisfaction or well-being; however, this effect was weakly significant ( p < 0.05).

Although the model for motivation did not reach significance, χ 2 (5) = 9.11, p = 0.11, the interaction between theory of mind and interpretation of the praise approached significance, B = −0.38, Wald = 3.80, p = 0.05.

Last, the interaction between Veterans’ physical health and social support predicting relationship satisfaction was marginally significant ( B = 0.08, SE = 0.04, z = 1.95, p = 0.05, 95% CI [0.00; 0.17]).

The analysis further revealed an only marginally significant interaction between sequence length and task, F (2,96) = 3.08; p = 0.05; η G 2 < 0.01, indicating that effect of the sequence length may have been slightly more pronounced for verbal recall ( M 5 = 0.804; SD 5 = 0.111; M 6 = 0.753; SD 6 = 0.120; M 7 = 0.689; SD 7 = 0.121) than for tonal recall ( M 5 = 0.750; SD 5 = 0.164; M 6 = 0.682; SD 6 = 0.159; M 7 = 0.658; SD 7 = 0.165).

A marginally significant main effect was found for BI [ F (1, 74) = 3.91, p = 0.05], indicating that overall, participants made more errors in trials which did not require BI (i.e., CBA or DBA task sequence) compared to trials which did require BI (i.e., ABA task sequence).

Both of them showed marginal significance ( p = 0.05), which may be related to the fluency state being a higher psychological state of competitive sports psychology, and it may also be related to the level of athletes’ trait mindfulness and the time effect of mindfulness training.

Congruency was marginally significant on the P200 amplitude [ F (1, 15) = 4.56, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.233], where incongruent conditions showed an enhanced positivity (Figure 3A ).

Interestingly, there was a nearly significant negative correlation between the quality of interactions and hand speed difference ( P = 0.05), suggesting that the more couples had a good quality of interaction, the better was the behavioral synchrony of hand speed.

In the first phase of the study, the traditional teaching model used by Group A had a moderately significant effect ( p < 0.05) on improving participants’ positive psychological qualities only in the “Cognition” dimension, with no significant effects observed in the other dimensions.

An item was flagged as exhibiting practically significant DIF if both (a) the omnibus Wald test demonstrated a p -value < 0.05 after Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction (i.e., p FDR < 0.05) and (b) the ESSD effect size was greater than 0.5, indicating a “medium” or larger amount of DIF ( Meade, 2010 ).

There was a main effect of meter [ F (1,49) = 39.90, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.449], a marginally significant main effect of group [ F (4,49) = 2.56, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.173] and a meter by group interaction [ F (4,49) = 4.59, p = 0.003, η p 2 = 0.272].

Exercise duration was almost significantly associated with gender ( p = 0.050), indicating that men exercised more than women.

The difference in emotional involvement was at the threshold of significance after FDR correction [ t (26) = 2.08, p = 0.05, 95% CI (0.01, 2.08)].

The second measure of self-reported anxiety (SCARED) also revealed a borderline significant change over time [ F (2, 12) = 3.41, p = 0.050].

Gender also approached significance as a moderator of the relationship between YouTuber attractiveness and PSR (β = −0.18; p = 0.05), and between YouTuber popularity and PSR (β = 0.22; p = 0.07).

Human subjects showed a trend of diminishing reaction times as a function of Go-time (linear regression, slope = −20 ms/s, p < 0.05), which could reflect the anticipation of trial termination (increasing hazard rate).

Aerobic exercise (1 study) showed marginal significance (SMD = −0.43, 95% CI [−0.85, 0.00], p = 0.05).

There was a marginally significant interaction between haptic strength and modality, b = -0.21, 95% CI = [-0.42, 0.00], χ 1 2 = 3.82, p = 0.05, suggesting that the relationship between haptic strength and iconicity was stronger in signed languages.

As the sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics were weakly correlated [i.e., coefficients of Pearson's correlation were lower than 0.5 and highly significant ( p < 0.05); see Supplementary material for full results], they were included as controls variables in our econometric analysis.

There was a marginally significant difference in T2 PTSD symptoms ( t [164] = 1.97, p = 0.05), with those participating at both times reporting lower symptom levels ( M = 32.64, SD = 16.93) compared to those who only participated at T2 ( M = 39.16, SD = 19.48).

The regression analysis demonstrated that work time control had a highly significant and positive correlation with job engagement ( b = 3.95, SE = 1.70, p < 0.05) and innovation ( b = 4.67, SE = 0.96, p < 0.01).

Results Opposite sex A marginally statistically significant interaction effect between the romantic prime and viewer's sex on attitude toward the male model ad was observed [ t = 1.65, p = 0.05 (one-tailed)].