[10] also palpable thyroid nodules occurs significantly more often in acromegalic patients TC also proved to be more common in acromegaly (OR = 7.9, RR = 7.6), however the calculations of publication bias was of borderline significance (p = 0.05), what can suggest slight overestimation of the result.
Statistics Statistical analysis was carried out using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric t test using GraphPad Prism 4 for Windows ( a p-value < 0.001 extremely significant; b p-value 0.001 to 0.01 very significant; c p-value 0.01 to 0.05 significant; p-value > 0.05 not significant).
There was a borderline significant strain×stress interaction for sessions (F1,41 = 4.07, P = .05), a main effect of strain on errors (F1,41 = 21.86, P <.01) and correction errors (F1,41 = 27.00, P <.01) to criterion ( Figure S3A–C ).
+); moreover, there was a slightly significant difference between the number of neutral (0) metaphorical expressions and the number of negative (−) ones, χ 2 = (1, N = 26) = 3.846, p = .05 (0 vs. −).
Taking the differences clearly leads to mean and variance stationary data, as a comparison of the three left panels of Figure 2 (original data) with its three right ones (differenced data) shows: all statistical tests (slope tests, Levene-s tests) reveal that none of the differenced TS show either a significant trend ( p <0.05) or heteroscedasticity ( p >0.1).
We had 80% power to detect nominally significant associations (p = 0.05) with SNPs that account for at least 0.8% of a trait's variance (full sample) or at least 1.0% of variance (individuals with MRIs).
This finding should be interpreted with caution since it was only marginally significant ( p = 0.05) in one out of several tests conducted.
The interaction effect between eccentricity and visual field was marginally significant, F(2,22) = 3.67, p = .05, indicating that the effect of target eccentricity was slightly larger on movements performed to the right visual field.
P<0.01 was considered highly significant difference and P<0.05 significant difference from control.
Among teenage mothers, the odds of institutional delivery was higher at the marginally significant level (p = 0.05) among the middle [AOR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.00 3.02] and rich [AOR: 13.70; 95% CI: 1.89 59.09] economic groups.
The CMS+fluoxetine group showed a trend of decrease in the plasma level of IL-1β from day 0 to day 120, with significant decrease in IL-1β level on day (60 (206.06±78.41) pg/ml, p <0.05) and day 120 ((141.05±56) pg/ml, p <0.05) as compared to its baseline level on day 0 (344.31±114.33) pg/ml via Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
More importantly, when assessing the state variable as a single two degree of freedom test, along with each of its associated interactions with year, all terms of this model are highly significant (P < 0.05).
For timed mathematics achievement in Grade 1, reaction time on the symbolic magnitude comparison task accounted for a significant proportion of variance in math performance, while only a trend towards significance was observed for accuracy on the non-symbolic magnitude comparison task ( p = .05).
The amount of lignin, relative to the initial values, between high management intensity (BA or SA) forests and low management intensity (BU and BS) forests was marginally significant at 180 DAI and 284 DAI (Klason lignin, P = 0.0500 and 0.0518) and at 180, 284 and 362 DAI (total lignin, P = 0.0558, 0.0541 and 0.0923, respectively; data not shown).
Metabolomic analyses Positive ion metabolites that were identified as nominally significant (p≤0.05) in SAMS patients are shown in S5 Table of S3 File .
Fourteen out of twenty-eight selected SNPs showed nominally significant associations at p <0.05 with different dimension-specific quantitative assessments of psychotic experiences but each failed to meet statistical significance post correction for multiple testing ( p <0.0008; one-tailed).
Furthermore, metastatic disease was borderline significant as negative predictor for survival (metastatic vs. non-metastatic; 5.3 years vs. not reached; P = 0.05).
The GLM analysis with three different response models (by varying the HRF peak latency with 3s increments) yielded almost entirely distinctive activation maps ( Fig 2B ), each of which was only marginally significant ( p <0.05, uncorrected).
There was a borderline significant association between getting biological treatment and having erosions (OR = 3.61, 95% CI: 1.04–14.45, p = 0.050) and a significant association between biological treatment and having moderate/severe DAS28-CRP (OR = 35.83, 95% CI: 10.18–164.94, p < 0.001).
As for cheating on exams, Model 3 showed a marginally significant negative association for extraversion ( b = –0.18, SE = 0.11, t = –1.97, p < .05), indicating that higher extraversion tended to decrease the probability of cheating.
Furthermore, a weighted polygenic risk score (PRS) made from the 18 SNPs common between the two datasets showed a nominally significant association ( P < 0.05) with the oral glucose tolerance test derived variables area under the curve (AUC) for insulin, AUC for insulin/AUC for glucose, insulin at 30 minutes and insulin sensitivity index ( S6 Table ).
parviglumis was highly significant ( X 2 = 113, p-value < 0.05).
Several genera, including Clostridium, Ruthenibacterium, and Dorea, showed nominally significant associations (p < 0.05).
Moderately significant T-cell proliferations were recorded in hamsters treated with free-CpG-ODN-2006 (Group III, p<0.05), lipo-CpG-ODN-2006 (Group IV, p<0.05), free-CpG-ODN-2006 plus miltefosine (Group V, p<0.01) and sub-curative miltefosine alone (Group VII, p<0.01) groups at day 4 post treatment in both ConA and SLA stimulated cells ( Figure 3A ).
Expression increases in miR-186 from post- to 60 min post-exercise (fold change = 1.58, P <0.001) paralleled a significant upregulation of SIRT6 mRNA (fold change = 1.66, P <0.05), a significant downregulation of TERF2IP mRNA (fold change = 0.54, P <0.01) and a strong trend towards significance for RAD50 (fold change = 0.76, P = 0.05).